Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 97656

Summary: dbus compile breaks with new pyrex build
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: greg <cornmander>
Component: [OLD] DevelopmentAssignee: foser (RETIRED) <foser>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: normal CC: alpeterson, andreabaso, castan.o, dmatt001, ensonic, eo, eradicator, gene, gentoo-bugs2, gentoo, gentoo_newbie, gooroo, javabob, jimmycap, jwilkickI, kkrizka, kwinczek, n.blanke, neil, rodri.cilla, root, sabban, sean, simprix, Tinitus1
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description greg 2005-07-01 13:51:04 UTC
The newest testing build of pyrex causes dbus to break at 'dbus_bindings' 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge the testing pyrex  
2.emerge dbus 
 
  
Actual Results:  
The dbus compile didn't compile dbus_bindings 

Expected Results:  
The dbus compile should have properly finished.
Comment 1 Glenn L. McGrath 2005-07-12 17:38:07 UTC
/usr/bin/python extract.py dbus_bindings.pyx.in -I..  > dbus_bindings.pyx
running echo '#include "dbus_h_wrapper.h"
'|cpp  -I..pyrexc dbus_bindings.pyx
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pyrexc", line 7, in ?
    from Pyrex.Compiler.Main import main
ImportError: No module named Pyrex.Compiler.Main
make[3]: [dbus_bindings.c] Error 1 (ignored)
if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I.. -I.. -I../dbus  -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/libxml2   -I/usr/include/python2.4 
-DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE=1   -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -Wall
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare -MT dbus_bindings.lo
-MD -MP -MF ".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo" -c -o dbus_bindings.lo dbus_bindings.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo" ".deps/dbus_bindings.Plo"; else rm -f
".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
mkdir .libs
 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../dbus
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2
-I/usr/include/python2.4 -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE=1 -march=athlon64 -O2
-pipe -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare -MT
dbus_bindings.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo -c dbus_bindings.c  -fPIC
-DPIC -o .libs/dbus_bindings.o
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: dbus_bindings.c: No such file or directory
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: no input files
make[3]: *** [dbus_bindings.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4/python'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4/python'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-13 10:08:21 UTC
what version of pyrex are you referring to ? Also, does downgrading or disabling
of docs generation solve this problem ?
Comment 3 Glenn L. McGrath 2005-07-13 17:32:30 UTC
I re-emerged pyrex 0.9.3-r2 and dbus compiles now.

My guess is that pyrex was broken due to some related python maintenance issues.
Comment 4 Phil Richards 2005-07-14 00:49:35 UTC
I've had the same problem - looking at the emerge output, it is clear that pyrex
was still under python2.3 site-packages; reemerging put it under 2.4.

I suspect I forgot to run python-updater on the latest python upgrade :-)

I still hate the way that important messages disappear in the morass of build
information (and, yes, I do keep the logs, but tend to forget to look at them :-()
Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-14 03:10:30 UTC
*** Bug 98973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-14 03:12:22 UTC
I guess that closes this one.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-17 10:19:33 UTC
*** Bug 99338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-18 14:09:12 UTC
*** Bug 99463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 00:39:22 UTC
*** Bug 99622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 01:58:27 UTC
*** Bug 99637 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 15:13:18 UTC
*** Bug 99727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-26 15:01:45 UTC
*** Bug 100413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Neil Stone 2005-07-26 15:55:42 UTC
that was obvoius..... NOT !!!

Any chance important things like this could be emailed to a given user ??
Comment 14 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-31 10:29:18 UTC
*** Bug 100909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-01 09:57:43 UTC
*** Bug 101003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-05 03:49:15 UTC
*** Bug 101419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-10 03:34:00 UTC
*** Bug 101961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-14 11:55:22 UTC
*** Bug 102524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-23 08:32:49 UTC
*** Bug 103466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-26 02:33:39 UTC
*** Bug 103804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-04 03:23:19 UTC
*** Bug 104777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-07 00:41:13 UTC
*** Bug 105102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-07 02:43:31 UTC
*** Bug 105126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-14 02:27:30 UTC
*** Bug 105936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Steev Klimaszewski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-01 21:23:47 UTC
*** Bug 111193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-11 13:18:35 UTC
*** Bug 112219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-24 04:19:22 UTC
*** Bug 113450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-03 05:19:27 UTC
*** Bug 117581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-16 08:31:40 UTC
*** Bug 119200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-24 23:58:57 UTC
*** Bug 120246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-05 04:03:54 UTC
*** Bug 139288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***