Summary: | dev-qt/qtquick1 - mixing 5.4.2 and 5.5.1 Qt modules causes build failures | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | matthias.grobarek |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Qt Bug Alias <qt> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | m.seifert |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563898 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565764 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565806 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564920 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566580 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 569924 | ||
Attachments: | build.log of the failing build. |
Description
matthias.grobarek
2015-10-31 12:02:23 UTC
Created attachment 415794 [details]
build.log of the failing build.
You have a mixed install of 5.4.2 and 5.5.1 Given that there were other random bugs caused by mixing versions of qt (e.g. bug 563898), I think at this point it would be safer to change all `>=` deps among qt modules to `~` deps. (In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #3) > Given that there were other random bugs caused by mixing versions of qt > (e.g. bug 563898), I think at this point it would be safer to change all > `>=` deps among qt modules to `~` deps. This seems reasonable. Is it OK to move the overlay dep changes to the main tree? I don't know if it's really worth a revbump. Yeah it should be ok. wrt revbumping, technically, you *should* do it. I'm sure the usual suspects will complain if you don't. That being said, personally I don't care. Thanks, revbumped to avoid it happening again. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=bab86516580f5e9d05445b94304903170f48b244 |