Summary: | x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-334.16-r? - usr/lib??/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 -> libGLESv2.so.334.16 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mariusz Ceier <mceier> |
Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) <jer> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sven.koehler, xarthisius |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Fixed ebuild |
Description
Mariusz Ceier
2014-02-08 20:30:08 UTC
Created attachment 369906 [details]
Fixed ebuild
Ebuild that fixes bugs #500708 and #500710 (this bug)
Try with -r3. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > Try with -r3. Yes, with -r3 should be fine (just synced portage) - that bug is for -r2. But the second bug I reported is also for -r3. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > Try with -r3. (In reply to Mariusz Ceier from comment #3) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > > Try with -r3. > > Yes, with -r3 should be fine (just synced portage) - that bug is for -r2. > But the second bug I reported is also for -r3. Hmm, looking at ebuild, shouldn't ${PV} in doexe libGLESv2.so.${PV} dosym libGLESv2.so.${PV} ${GL_ROOT}/libGLESv2.so.2 dosym libGLESv2.so.2 ${GL_ROOT}/libGLESv2.so be ${NV_SOVER} ? Won't this fail for FreeBSD/Gentoo ? (In reply to Mariusz Ceier from comment #4) > Won't this fail for FreeBSD/Gentoo ? I'll be looking forward to the bug report. |