Bug 498328

Summary:	=mail-client/claws-mail-3.12.0 stabilization request
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) <polynomial-c>
Component:	[OLD] Keywording and Stabilization	Assignee:	Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) <polynomial-c>
Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX
Severity:	normal	CC:	alexander, net-mail+disabled, pacho
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	468984
Bug Blocks:

Description Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-01-17 07:21:27 UTC

It's in the tree for about half a year now. I've used it until version bump to 3.9.3 and it was quite stable in that time. So time to give it some stable love maybe?

Comment 1 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-01-21 21:14:28 UTC

I would love to go with 3.9.3, but I am waiting for bug 468984, where alpha, ppc, ppc64 and sparc should rekeyword.

Comment 2 Christian Tietz 2014-01-25 02:10:51 UTC

I would to like to second that, as I have been running 3.9.2 as well as 3.9.3 all along since the moment they hit portage without encountering any issues at all. Please go ahead.

Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-05-31 08:47:37 UTC

this would need libindicate to be stable too... or to use.stable.mask libindicate (why doesn't it use "ayatana" USE?) and webkit USEs

Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2015-07-07 18:45:38 UTC

Is anything blocking 3.11.x or more newer versions than 3.9.x?

Comment 5 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2015-12-21 08:27:42 UTC

Arches please test and mark stable =mail-client/claws-mail-3.12.0 with target KEYWORDS:

alpha amd64 ~arm hppa ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd

Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev

2015-12-25 15:21:37 UTC

(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #5)
> Arches please test and mark stable =mail-client/claws-mail-3.12.0 with
> target KEYWORDS:
> 
> alpha amd64 ~arm hppa ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd

no sense to stabilize a vulnerable version unless I'm missing something that maintainer knows.

Please cc arches in bug 569010 if my suppose is right.