| Summary: | [science overlay] sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Justin Lecher (RETIRED) <jlec> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jean.brefort, sci-chemistry |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 155109 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 348231, 383147, 388509 | ||
| Attachments: | Unfinished gchemutils-0.13.6.ebuild | ||
|
Description
Justin Lecher (RETIRED)
2011-10-29 20:39:42 UTC
Not sure it's a good idea. 0.13.3 is highly unstable. And starting from 0.13.5, osmesa will not be anymore a dependency. nice to know. what about 13.2? You should stay with a stable release (0.12.9 for now) until next stable is out. Otherwise, 0.13.4 (due next month) should be almost usable, provided there is a goffice release (0.9.x) for which there is no plan at the moment AFAIK. Version 13.1 was added a year ago. So I thought about moving forward. The 12.9 release not even touched the tree. I see, but I think that you should not play with development versions, they can crash and loose the data at any moment. (In reply to comment #1) > And starting from 0.13.5, osmesa will not be anymore a dependency. From http://www.nongnu.org/gchemutils/ === Current status Last stable release is: 0.12.10 Last devel release is: 0.13.5 === None of them is in the tree right now, nor in the Science overlay. Time for a version bump? Currently I find it impossible to emerge gchemutils :( Thanks in advance. I will check that it depends on >=x11-libs/goffice-0.10 which is not available Created attachment 309407 [details]
Unfinished gchemutils-0.13.6.ebuild
I've started writing ebuild for gchemutils-0.13.6 to resolve another bug. I quickly realized the ebuilds currently in tree are not workable (mostly everything was invalid). Started this one from scratch. It's completely untested because the required goffice is not in Portage.
Removed from Portage. Converting this bug to "New package" request for reintroducing gchemutils back to tree in future. Bug 348231 and Bug 388509 will be closed as WONTFIX and should be looked into when committing back to Portage. The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4a452b0ba33a3764af0d6d378fb7f1606d083ba5 commit 4a452b0ba33a3764af0d6d378fb7f1606d083ba5 Author: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-03-01 16:20:23 +0000 Commit: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-03-01 16:21:16 +0000 sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils: Introduce gnome chemistry utils Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/388887 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.90, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils/Manifest | 1 + .../gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17-gnumeric.patch | 47 +++++++++++++++++ .../gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17.ebuild | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++ sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils/metadata.xml | 10 ++++ 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+) |