Bug 388887 – [science overlay] sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-10-29 20:39:42 UTC]

PLease bump.
needs libOSMesa.so.

[Comment 1 Jean Bréfort 2011-10-30 06:01:57 UTC]

Not sure it's a good idea. 0.13.3 is highly unstable. And starting from 0.13.5, osmesa will not be anymore a dependency.

[Comment 2 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-10-30 09:47:33 UTC]

nice to know. what about 13.2?

[Comment 3 Jean Bréfort 2011-10-30 11:00:40 UTC]

You should stay with a stable release (0.12.9 for now) until next stable is out. Otherwise, 0.13.4 (due next month) should be almost usable, provided there is a goffice release (0.9.x) for which there is no plan at the moment AFAIK.

[Comment 4 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-10-30 11:13:27 UTC]

Version 13.1 was added a year ago. So I thought about moving forward. The 12.9 release not even touched the tree.

[Comment 5 Jean Bréfort 2011-10-30 13:34:30 UTC]

I see, but I think that you should not play with development versions, they can crash and loose the data at any moment.

[Comment 6 urcindalo 2012-01-25 11:22:30 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> And starting from 0.13.5, osmesa will not be anymore a dependency.

From http://www.nongnu.org/gchemutils/
===
Current status
Last stable release is: 0.12.10
Last devel release is: 0.13.5
===

None of them is in the tree right now, nor in the Science overlay.
Time for a version bump? 
Currently I find it impossible to emerge gchemutils :(

Thanks in advance.

[Comment 7 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2012-01-25 11:23:46 UTC]

I will check that

[Comment 8 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2012-01-27 14:24:36 UTC]

it depends on >=x11-libs/goffice-0.10 which is not available

[Comment 9 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-04-18 13:10:40 UTC]

Created attachment 309407 [details]
Unfinished gchemutils-0.13.6.ebuild

I've started writing ebuild for gchemutils-0.13.6 to resolve another bug. I quickly realized the ebuilds currently in tree are not workable (mostly everything was invalid). Started this one from scratch. It's completely untested because the required goffice is not in Portage.

[Comment 10 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-05-21 06:48:36 UTC]

Removed from Portage. Converting this bug to "New package" request for reintroducing gchemutils back to tree in future.

Bug 348231 and Bug 388509 will be closed as WONTFIX and should be looked into when committing back to Portage.

[Comment 11 Larry the Git Cow 2020-03-01 16:21:22 UTC]

The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4a452b0ba33a3764af0d6d378fb7f1606d083ba5

commit 4a452b0ba33a3764af0d6d378fb7f1606d083ba5
Author:     Pacho Ramos <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2020-03-01 16:20:23 +0000
Commit:     Pacho Ramos <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2020-03-01 16:21:16 +0000

    sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils: Introduce gnome chemistry utils
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/388887
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.90, Repoman-2.3.20
    Signed-off-by: Pacho Ramos <[e-mail]>

 sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils/Manifest       |  1 +
 .../gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17-gnumeric.patch   | 47 +++++++++++++++++
 .../gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17.ebuild           | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 sci-chemistry/gnome-chemistry-utils/metadata.xml   | 10 ++++
 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+)