Summary: | rekeyword app-text/active-dvi-1.9 (was: app-text/active-dvi-1.9.0 version bump) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Arseny Solokha <asolokha> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | tomka |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | KEYWORDREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://gallium.inria.fr/advi/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 339591 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Arseny Solokha
2010-04-19 16:47:18 UTC
bumped, at least, it needs app-text/htmlc, arches please rekeyword active-dvi-1.9 Seems to miss some LaTeX deps: (/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size12.clo)) (./manual.sty) ! LaTeX Error: File `fullpage.sty' not found. Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file name: Could adding of "dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra" to virtual/latex-base's RDEPEND be actually bearable? "Local" fix could be also applied to app-text/active-dvi-1.9.ebuild: --- active-dvi-1.9.ebuild~ 2011-02-25 17:20:23.080422424 +0700 +++ active-dvi-1.9.ebuild 2011-02-25 17:21:50.799326696 +0700 @@ -21,8 +21,9 @@ RDEPEND=">=dev-lang/ocaml-3.11.2[ocamlopt?] >=dev-ml/camlimages-3.0.1[truetype,tiff,jpeg,gs] - virtual/latex-base app-text/ghostscript-gpl + dev-texlive/texlive-latex + dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra x11-libs/libXinerama" DEPEND="${RDEPEND} || ( ( dev-texlive/texlive-pstricks dev-texlive/texlive-pictures ) (In reply to comment #3) > Could adding of "dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra" to virtual/latex-base's > RDEPEND be actually bearable? Alexis, is this ok? (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Could adding of "dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra" to virtual/latex-base's > > RDEPEND be actually bearable? > > Alexis, is this ok? no, this would kill the point of a rather minimal virtual... tl-latexextra dep should be added to advi DEPENDs (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Could adding of "dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra" to virtual/latex-base's > > > RDEPEND be actually bearable? > > > > Alexis, is this ok? > > no, this would kill the point of a rather minimal virtual... tl-latexextra dep > should be added to advi DEPENDs and fixed Looks good on x86, but =app-text/htmlc-2.21.0 should also get keyworded together with it. x86 done (htmlc and activedvi). Thanks Andreas. ~ppc done, last arch closing |