Summary: | Stabilization request for dev-lang/ghc-6.8.2 and friends | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Lennart Kolmodin (RETIRED) <kolmodin> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo's Haskell Language team <haskell> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sparc |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 208230 |
Description
Lennart Kolmodin (RETIRED)
2008-07-06 09:44:13 UTC
dev-haskell/happy-1.17 seems to be missing in your list. (no clue if there are more, but portage complained about multiple versions pulled in of dev-haskell/cabal) Oh, sure. Add that too to the list, please. It's the latest stable version available. (In reply to comment #0) > Testing both USE="binary" and USE="-binary" is useful. > The single most important package depending on packages in this > stabilization is probably dev-util/darcs. # emerge -1av darcs These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ] dev-haskell/filepath-1.0 USE="-doc -profile" 0 kB [ebuild UD] dev-lang/ghc-6.6.1 [6.8.2] USE="-bash-completion -binary* -doc* -ghcbootstrap" 0 kB [ebuild N ] dev-util/darcs-1.0.9 USE="-doc" 1,035 kB should we stabilize 1.1.0_pre1? The rest looks good to go stable on amd64/x86, no problems found. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Testing both USE="binary" and USE="-binary" is useful. > > The single most important package depending on packages in this > > stabilization is probably dev-util/darcs. > > # emerge -1av darcs > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] dev-haskell/filepath-1.0 USE="-doc -profile" 0 kB > [ebuild UD] dev-lang/ghc-6.6.1 [6.8.2] USE="-bash-completion -binary* -doc* > -ghcbootstrap" 0 kB > [ebuild N ] dev-util/darcs-1.0.9 USE="-doc" 1,035 kB > > should we stabilize 1.1.0_pre1? > The rest looks good to go stable on amd64/x86, no problems found. > Excellent. Yes, please stabilize darcs-1.1.0_pre1 too. It's the last released version in the 1.x series. Ebuilds for darcs-2.x will be committed shortly... Could we please add dev-haskell/filepath-1.1.0.0 to the list too? The currently most stable filepath is 1.0, which doesn't compile with ghc-6.8.2 without patching. amd64/x86 stable I don't see any reason why hppa should have been excluded. :\ # : Not really looked at right now, left alone. = : Stable for HPPA. [Among the packages I didn't look at were some that had their keywords dropped. Again a major loss of a good body of work here...] #dev-haskell/alut-2.1.0.0 #dev-haskell/cgi-3001.1.5.1 #dev-haskell/fgl-5.4.1.1 #dev-haskell/glut-2.1.1.1 #dev-haskell/haskell-src-1.0.1.1 #dev-haskell/network-2.1.0.0 #dev-haskell/openal-1.3.1.1 #dev-haskell/opengl-2.2.1.1 #dev-haskell/parallel-1.0.0.0 #dev-haskell/stm-2.1.1.0 #dev-haskell/time-1.1.2.0 =dev-haskell/cabal-1.2.3.0 =dev-haskell/happy-1.17 =dev-haskell/html-1.0.1.1 =dev-haskell/hunit-1.2.0.0 =dev-haskell/mtl-1.1.0.0 =dev-haskell/parsec-2.1.0.0 =dev-haskell/quickcheck-1.1.0.0 =dev-haskell/regex-base-0.72.0.1 =dev-haskell/regex-compat-0.71.0.1 =dev-haskell/regex-posix-0.72.0.2 =dev-lang/ghc-6.8.2 =dev-haskell/xhtml-3000.0.2.1 Sparc is now stable for the listed versions of: cabal parsec haskell-src opengl glut openal alut quickcheck hunit html mtl network fgl xhtml cgi time stm parallel regex-{base,posix, compat} Note further that the regex-{base,posix,compat}-{0.93.1, 0.93.1, 0.91} versions are good on sparc, but are keyworded ~sparc awaiting further instructions. I am leaving sparc on the CC in case I have missed anything or you need anything else. (In reply to comment #9) > Sparc is now stable for the listed versions of: > cabal > parsec > haskell-src > opengl > glut > openal > alut > quickcheck > hunit > html > mtl > network > fgl > xhtml > cgi > time > stm > parallel > regex-{base,posix, compat} > > Note further that the regex-{base,posix,compat}-{0.93.1, 0.93.1, 0.91} versions > are good on sparc, but are keyworded ~sparc awaiting further instructions. > > I am leaving sparc on the CC in case I have missed anything or you need > anything else. > Also, sparc stable for happy-1.17 (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Note further that the regex-{base,posix,compat}-{0.93.1, 0.93.1, 0.91} versions > > are good on sparc, but are keyworded ~sparc awaiting further instructions. Right. Wait with those, please. They are considered to be somewhat in testing state by some of the community. ~arch is good enough so far. > Also, sparc stable for happy-1.17 Great, thanks. |