Summary: | baselayout-2 showing 'wrong' message for fsck.xfs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Markus Rothe (RETIRED) <corsair> |
Component: | [OLD] baselayout | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | roy |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=780 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | add the p option |
Description
Markus Rothe (RETIRED)
2008-02-07 21:32:51 UTC
So someone just needs to add the -p option as we're using that now instead of -a. Created attachment 149230 [details, diff]
add the p option
I'm not sure why I haven't visited this bug for that long..
this small patch adds the p option to fsck.xfs.
base-system: do you want to apply it to xfsprogs?
Markus, Feel free to commit. (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=149230) [edit] > add the p option Not sure why you are trapping A and P as they mean different things to a and p. Should just trap a and p :) (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Created an attachment (id=149230) [edit] > > add the p option > > Not sure why you are trapping A and P as they mean different things to a and p. > Should just trap a and p :) > I'm not sure, too... Corrected that and opened an upstream bug report at [1]. I decided to not add this patch to portage for now. I'll add it if upstream decides to _not_ add it -- so this is just not yet another patch to maintain. ;-) [1] http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=780 |