Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 126992

Summary: Stable sys-fs/squashfs-tools-3.0 w/ gentoo-sources 2.6.16
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) <wolf31o2>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Gentoo LiveCD Package Maintainers <livecd>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: nunomilheiro, philantrop
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on: 126972    
Bug Blocks: 127003    

Description Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-20 11:50:23 UTC
Since gentoo-sources 2.6.16 has the new squashfs 3.0 patch, we need squashfs-tools stabilized at the same time.
Comment 1 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-22 18:32:37 UTC
I've marked x86 stable.  Other arches, please do the same when marking gentoo-sources 2.6.16 stable.
Comment 2 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-22 23:07:31 UTC
stable on ppc64
Comment 3 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-30 19:52:55 UTC
Marked ppc stable.
Comment 4 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-02 10:39:56 UTC
sparc stable since 2.4.32-sparc-r4 has squash3 (and gs-2.6.16-r4+ went ~sparc).
Comment 5 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-09 14:17:24 UTC
Stable on amd64
Comment 6 Alexandre Nuno Milheiro 2006-05-10 03:43:03 UTC
It seems that ther are some problems with the squashfs 3.0

As we can see in squashfs bugs page :

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1454647&group_id=63835&atid=505341

In three of my gentoo system where I use squashfs with unionfs to save space and I/O, i experience the same bug with gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3 so I reverted to squashfs 2.1
Comment 7 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-10 05:49:49 UTC
I have built *several* CD images on multiple architectures now, using squashfs 3.0 and squashfs-tools 3.0 and had no issues.  Perhaps some more information (preferably on a separate bug) would be in order, since I cannot reproduce this on any platform I've tested it on so far.
Comment 8 Wulf Krueger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-22 08:57:34 UTC
According to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3464655.html#3464655 and http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org/msg00163.html sys-fs/squashfs-tools-3.0 need a kernel >= 2.6.16. 

Shouldn't there be an appropriate RDEPEND in the ebuild before stablising it? (Yes, I've read the summary but I thought this should have been implemented before the stabilisation request?)
Comment 9 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-24 08:06:26 UTC
Nope.

See, squashfs-tools doesn't require *any* kernel version to run.  It will happily build a squashfs image no matter what your kernel version happens to be.  In fact, it'll even create an image if your kernel doesn't have squashfs support.

Now, being able to decompress that image in the kernel is completely independent of this bug, and is what you seem to be pointing to as a problem.  Anyway, the dependencies are correct.
Comment 10 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-08 09:19:06 UTC
Well, arm and ia64 are already stable.  Alpha/HPPA, please test this.  All you need to do is verify that it can create a proper squashfs image, since this is just the userland portion.
Comment 11 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-05 05:19:57 UTC
hppa done
Comment 12 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-14 00:30:48 UTC
Alpha has a higher version stable now, so marking RESOLVED.