Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 56211 (chriswhite) - Retire: Chris White (ChrisWhite)
Summary: Retire: Chris White (ChrisWhite)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: chriswhite
Product: Gentoo Developers/Staff
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Retirement (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Community Relations Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-06 01:36 UTC by Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED)
Modified: 2021-02-03 08:29 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-07-06 01:36:37 UTC
email: webmaster@securesystem.info
age:   20
loc:   Stockton, CA USA
real name: Chris White
IRC:   ChrisWhite
mentor: me
role:  media-{sound,video} maintainer

2 week mentorship period ends July 20
Comment 1 Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-07-14 12:23:00 UTC
he's all setup now =)
Comment 2 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-12-02 10:31:04 UTC
Ok, so his latest round of screwups include:

* committing a tarball (net-analyzer/admlogger_ebuild.tar.bz2) into gentoo-x86
* branching the whole of gentoo-x86 with a new 'chris' branch
* committing a bogus top-level (perl-gcpan/)
* committing bogus files to top-level (en.txt, ja.txt)

Reopening since this isn't exactly the first time he's utterly h0rked the tree.
Comment 3 Chris White (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-02 13:08:32 UTC
To explain the situation, I was testing kde program (cervisa) by doing a cvs 
checkout of the tree.  Unfortunately this mess you see here arose.  The 
following then occured:

Halyc0n notified me of the gcpan directory, and a few other ebuilds that were 
problematic.  I fixed the mentioned ones, and looked at package.gentoo.org to 
make sure I hadn't missed anything.

ferringb notified me of the branch issue shortly afterwards, to which I was 
called to #gentoo-infra and discussed the issue with Ramareth, ferringb, and 
Halyc0n.  The branch fixing looked fairly easy, and there didn't seem to be any 
outstanding occuring that would cause me to believe the problem was that severe.

I kept an eye on #gentoo-bugs till about 4AM or so fixing any bugs that appeared 
to be something that was caused by the situation.

Notification by Mr_Bones_ and Anarchy on other packages I missed.  Those were 
fixed as I noticed them.

tomk notified me to cleanout my entire local cvs directory, I did so.  I was 
notified about the ja/en.txt files by Flameeyes, but wanted to ask a cvs admin 
for removal, as they exist in the toplevel cvs, and I didn't feel comfortable 
commiting something at that level (same with the perl-gcpan directory), and 
would rather take the better approach at that.  The admlogger tarball I didn't 
realize about and it looks to be missing (if I did miss it, feel free to open a 
seperate bug and I'll fix it).

Since I will most likely be asked a "Why should we keep you" question (I assume 
judging from the tone of the last comment it's just that), I'll present the 
following (these are for the time period before this event):

- Before the event, I do not recall a time that a QA member has approached me 
with a repoman issue.
- I helped to increase the number of x86 markings and security turnarounds for 
the x86 herd (Feel free to ask Halyc0n)
- I helped to collaborate with mcummings and address the need for ebuild bumps
- The actions during the event were not intentional (I have the feeling some 
people believe they were?). No, I didn't feel good at all about what happened.
- Tested the entire of KDE, every single app and provided patches in some 
instances
- Helped gustavoz with narrowing down on a missing patch that was causing touch 
to create files with invalid dates, important enough to have a new kernel rolled 
out

That is all, if supenssion is the end result, I propose 60 days.  Appoligies to 
all that were effected (users and devs), and expecially to infra for the work 
they had to do because of it.
Comment 4 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-02 13:47:39 UTC
> * branching the whole of gentoo-x86 with a new 'chris' branch

Our friendly infra monkeys have now dealt with this issue or so I'm told.
Comment 5 Mike Doty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-02 13:50:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> To explain the situation, I was testing kde program (cervisa) by doing a cvs 
> checkout of the tree.  Unfortunately this mess you see here arose.  The 
> following then occured:
First off, you shouldn't have tested naything new like that against our tree(s)
[snip]
> That is all, if supenssion is the end result, I propose 60 days.  Appoligies to 
> all that were effected (users and devs), and expecially to infra for the work 
> they had to do because of it.
A suspension is just plain silly.  You fucked up(rather badly), when people
pointed it out to you, you did what you could to correct it, and then
apoligized.  You should review the developer handbook for the proper way to
commit to the tree.
Comment 6 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-12-02 14:03:58 UTC
If this were the first time that Chris had done something silly and ended up
breaking things through sheer carelessness, I wouldn't've reopened the bug.
Comment 7 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-12 18:13:49 UTC
Yes, he has been doing a lot to help out, but I was unaware he was only
committing most of KDE-3.4.3 to stable.  He said he was going to handle this the
other day, but our users have been having fun with packages upgrading and
downgrading because of packages still being ~x86 (this is bug #115357 for
reference).  He also missed one package in the monolithic KDE packages that
completely broke the dep tree for users.

Also, there is still a tag, "start", in the tree that he created.
Comment 8 Mike Doty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-06 10:11:37 UTC
should be devrel
Comment 9 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-02-28 20:54:19 UTC
any reason this is closed ?  i dont think there is ...
Comment 10 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-03-01 16:11:14 UTC
closing again
Comment 11 Christel Dahlskjaer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-02 09:00:16 UTC
Hi, 
As ChrisWhite is the #gentoo ops liasion for user-relations I would like him added to the user-relations alias please.
Comment 12 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-08 09:53:27 UTC
Added a while ago, closing.
Comment 13 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-17 08:43:52 UTC
Chris recently announced his resignation.

Chris, good luck in the future.
Comment 14 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-25 04:12:12 UTC
Closing as Chris decided to stay after all.
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-01 20:38:54 UTC
MIA since October 2006, reopening.
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-10 10:57:17 UTC
Well, I reassigned the bug m-needed since they were really really stale; Chris is still CCed in case he gets less busy w/ pole dancing. *g*
Comment 17 Dimitry Bradt (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-16 19:50:34 UTC
Infra, chriswhite should be ready for retirement.
Comment 18 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2007-07-10 12:17:16 UTC
Retired by infra on 2007/July/10.
Pending planet and forums.
Comment 19 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2007-07-10 12:19:33 UTC
infra stuff completed.
Comment 20 Anders Hellgren gentoo-dev 2007-07-10 12:59:28 UTC
Forums done.
Comment 21 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-14 10:13:43 UTC
Updated userinfo.xml; Removed from #gentoo-dev access; Removed from herds.xml (perl and pda); metadata.xml entries updated.
Comment 22 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-15 11:25:16 UTC
project pages cleaned up.
Comment 23 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-15 15:50:26 UTC
removed from planet
Comment 24 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-15 16:15:36 UTC
Our bug again.
Comment 25 Christina Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-24 19:36:14 UTC
removed #-dev access, removed cloak, updated userinfo.xml
Comment 26 Christian Heim (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-31 17:41:20 UTC
No metadata.xml entries present any longer, went away w/ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/50444.
Comment 27 Christina Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-01 17:59:36 UTC
Retirement done, closing bug.