Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 151938
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) <ticho@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Steve Haeck <gentoo_steve@shic.co.uk>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 151938 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 151938 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-10-19 03:21 0000
Duplicity 0.42 is the latest version in portage, and also the latest version
available on the project homepage [ http://duplicity.nongnu.org/ ].  It seems
that development ground to a halt back in 2002.

There is a bug preventing use of duplicity built using the gentoo ebuild with
sftp (using the scp:// url syntax) where the remote /bin/sh is actually bash. 
The bug arises because 'echo -e' doesn't behave as the author intended under
this (fairly common) configuration.  This has been patched in various
distributions, including, for example, Debian.  Substituting "printf" for "echo
-e" (as seems to have been done for Debian) in src/backends.py:298 resolves
this problem for me, and I have verified this by creating a patch which I'm now
using  myself from an overlay.

For obvious disaster-recovery reasons, it would be advantageous if this patch
were included in the official Portage... I'm not sure how to go about this... I
can offer my ebuild - though I make no guarantees that it meets any stylistic
expectations for portage... and, in any case, this seems a trivial change.

------- Comment #1 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-10-19 03:57:04 0000 -------
I'll have a look at this in few hours when I'm back from work. It should be a
simple sed hack, or a patch which goes to $FILESDIR at worst, so there's no
need to post an ebuild.

------- Comment #2 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-10-19 10:19:39 0000 -------
I just committed 0.4.2-r1, with fixes to this and one other bug from our
bugzilla. A sed call was enough.

Feel free to reopen if something else needs to be done in this regard.

Thanks for reporting!

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug