First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 151938
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) <ticho@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Steve Haeck <gentoo_steve@shic.co.uk>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 151938 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 151938 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-10-19 03:21 0000
Duplicity 0.42 is the latest version in portage, and also the latest version
available on the project homepage [ http://duplicity.nongnu.org/ ].  It seems
that development ground to a halt back in 2002.

There is a bug preventing use of duplicity built using the gentoo ebuild with
sftp (using the scp:// url syntax) where the remote /bin/sh is actually bash. 
The bug arises because 'echo -e' doesn't behave as the author intended under
this (fairly common) configuration.  This has been patched in various
distributions, including, for example, Debian.  Substituting "printf" for "echo
-e" (as seems to have been done for Debian) in src/backends.py:298 resolves
this problem for me, and I have verified this by creating a patch which I'm now
using  myself from an overlay.

For obvious disaster-recovery reasons, it would be advantageous if this patch
were included in the official Portage... I'm not sure how to go about this... I
can offer my ebuild - though I make no guarantees that it meets any stylistic
expectations for portage... and, in any case, this seems a trivial change.

------- Comment #1 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-10-19 03:57:04 0000 -------
I'll have a look at this in few hours when I'm back from work. It should be a
simple sed hack, or a patch which goes to $FILESDIR at worst, so there's no
need to post an ebuild.

------- Comment #2 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-10-19 10:19:39 0000 -------
I just committed 0.4.2-r1, with fixes to this and one other bug from our
bugzilla. A sed call was enough.

Feel free to reopen if something else needs to be done in this regard.

Thanks for reporting!

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug