Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 409373 (CVE-2012-1181) - <www-apache/mod_fcgid-2.3.7: FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass is ignored in VirtualHost (CVE-2012-1181)
Summary: <www-apache/mod_fcgid-2.3.7: FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass is ignored in VirtualH...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2012-1181
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL:
Whiteboard: B3 [glsa]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-22 20:26 UTC by GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot
Modified: 2012-07-09 23:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot gentoo-dev 2012-03-22 20:26:11 UTC
CVE-2012-1181 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1181):
  fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server
  does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual
  host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of
  service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a
  process count higher than the intended limit.
Comment 1 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2012-04-29 17:22:21 UTC
According to upstream this is fixed in 2.3.7:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902
Comment 2 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-13 08:38:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> According to upstream this is fixed in 2.3.7:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902

I just pushed 2.3.7 to portage FYI.
Comment 3 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-14 01:01:46 UTC
Great, thanks.

Arches, please test and mark stable:
=www-apache/mod_fcgid-2.3.7
Target keywords : "amd64 ppc x86"
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-05-14 18:31:09 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 5 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-21 10:01:18 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 6 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-06-08 17:42:16 UTC
ppc done
Comment 7 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-06-10 15:31:19 UTC
Thanks, folks. GLSA Vote: yes.
Comment 8 Sean Amoss (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2012-06-11 23:18:22 UTC
GLSA vote: yes.

Added to existing GLSA request.
Comment 9 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot gentoo-dev 2012-07-09 23:36:57 UTC
This issue was resolved and addressed in
 GLSA 201207-09 at http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201207-09.xml
by GLSA coordinator Sean Amoss (ackle).