Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 462048 (CVE-2011-1164) - net-misc/vino: two vulnerabilities (CVE-2011-{1164,1165})
Summary: net-misc/vino: two vulnerabilities (CVE-2011-{1164,1165})
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2011-1164
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal minor (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL:
Whiteboard: B4 [ebuild+]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-17 14:16 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2016-03-01 06:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-03-17 14:16:11 UTC 
CVE-2011-1164 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1164 :

Vino before 2.99.4 can connect external networks contrary to the statement in the vino-preferences dialog box, which might make it easier for remote attackers to perform attacks.


CVE-2011-1165 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1165 :

Vino, possibly before 3.2, does not properly document that it opens ports in UPnP routers when the "Configure network to automatically accept connections" setting is enabled, which might make it easier for remote attackers to perform further attacks.
Comment 1 GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot gentoo-dev 2013-03-20 22:45:29 UTC 
CVE-2011-1165 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1165):
  Vino, possibly before 3.2, does not properly document that it opens ports in
  UPnP routers when the "Configure network to automatically accept
  connections" setting is enabled, which might make it easier for remote
  attackers to perform further attacks.

CVE-2011-1164 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1164):
  Vino before 2.99.4 can connect external networks contrary to the statement
  in the vino-preferences dialog box, which might make it easier for remote
  attackers to perform attacks.
Comment 2 Chris Reffett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2013-09-17 00:13:06 UTC 
I guess we don't have a fix for the 2.x branch?
Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-06-01 11:44:04 UTC 
(In reply to Chris Reffett from comment #2)
> I guess we don't have a fix for the 2.x branch?

No, but we have 3.x versions already in stable
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-06-01 13:28:55 UTC 
vino-3.8.1-r1 fixes this, bug #478252
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-10-24 07:46:55 UTC 
This is fixed long time ago, then, maybe this could be closed (or, at least, Whiteboard be updated per security team policy as the vulnerable ebuilds are neither present)
Comment 6 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-03-01 06:04:30 UTC 
All vulnerable versions removed from tree.  GLSA Vote: No