Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 98426 - sabbu-0.2.5 (new package)
Summary: sabbu-0.2.5 (new package)
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Reported: 2005-07-08 21:37 UTC by Vadim Berezniker
Modified: 2005-08-27 10:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

sabbu 0.2.5 ebuild (sabbu-0.2.5.ebuild,834 bytes, text/plain)
2005-07-08 21:38 UTC, Vadim Berezniker

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vadim Berezniker 2005-07-08 21:37:34 UTC
This is an ebuild for "sabbu" (subtitling software).

Judging from other ebuilds this one would probably belong in media-video
Comment 1 Vadim Berezniker 2005-07-08 21:38:17 UTC
Created attachment 62981 [details]
sabbu 0.2.5 ebuild
Comment 2 Vadim Berezniker 2005-07-30 21:36:57 UTC
Is there anything I can do to speed up my program getting into portage?
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-27 09:09:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is there anything I can do to speed up my program getting into portage?

Sure, let's start with fixing the ebuild. ;)

1/ Missing header.
2/ Keywords do not follow policy.
3/ nls does not appear to be used anywhere for compile, did I miss something?
Please clarify.
4/ Wrt src_compile(), either it's parallel-make compliant or not, no way between.
5/ Why does it inherit toolchain-funcs, flag-o-matic already inherits that one,
  and besides - I don't see it used anywhere in the ebuild.

Some docs:

Please reopen when you have submitted a fixed ebuild.
Comment 4 Vadim Berezniker 2005-08-27 09:48:12 UTC
I don't have time to play around with ebuilds. I was hoping that by submitting a
simple ebuild instead of just a "please add package to portage", I could make it
easier for it to get added to portage. If not, then fine. Not having it in
portage won't kill me. 

I have to say just closing the bug as WONTFIX is pretty disrespectful. 
Comment 5 Ciaran McCreesh 2005-08-27 10:25:27 UTC
He didn't just close it as WONTFIX. He gave you a list of things that would
needed to be fixed before the ebuild could be included. Since we don't have a