Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 97253 - Xscreensaver 4.22-r1 doesn't obey gnome use flag
Summary: Xscreensaver 4.22-r1 doesn't obey gnome use flag
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Jonathan Smith (RETIRED)
URL: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-27 13:26 UTC by Mario
Modified: 2005-06-30 09:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mario 2005-06-27 13:26:19 UTC
As of xscreensaver 4.21, a new feature was introduced that places a "New Login"
button to launch a new gdmflexiserver on the Xscreensaver unlock page.

Although a very useful feature for gdm users, some users (Like me and several
other ATI users) are plagued by a problem that prevents them from launching
additional xservers and switching VTs without corrupting the display.

Personally I use gdm and like it, but would like some way to keep this feature
disabled for xscreensaver.  I don't particularly like the thought that anyone
can come and click that button and mess up what I had running in X.

I think that just using the gnome USE flag to control whether this is disabled
is probably a much better idea to do.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:




My current workaround is to replace this block:
        use gnome || has_version gnome-base/gdm \
                && myconf="${myconf} --with-login-manager" \
                || myconf="${myconf} --without-login-manager"

with:
        if use gnome; then
                myconf="${myconf} --with-login-manager"
        else
                myconf="${myconf} --without-login-manager"
        fi
Comment 1 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-29 09:22:17 UTC
using the gnome USE flag is a bad idea for this feature... perhaps we should
change the name to something else? "new-login" perhaps?

if new-login is not enabled (as would be the default), users would be given an
einfo about its benifits and drawbacks

sound good?
Comment 2 Mario 2005-06-29 09:50:03 UTC
Yea, I like this idea alot better.
Comment 3 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-30 09:23:12 UTC
fix0r3d... thanks for reporting :-)