Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 88666 - "going-stable"-arch test for subversion (+ apr + apr-util)
Summary: "going-stable"-arch test for subversion (+ apr + apr-util)
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED)
Depends on:
Blocks: 146062
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2005-04-10 20:00 UTC by Christian Parpart (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-09-05 02:21 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-10 20:00:38 UTC
please test subversion-1.1.4-r1 on your architecture and TELL me when stable.

please do not mark stable yourself as we need to do so at once (binary compatibility changes in apr and apr-util).
Comment 1 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-10 20:03:24 UTC
NOTE: this includes testing of dev-libs/apr-0.9.6-r1 and dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.6 as well.
Comment 2 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-11 06:54:36 UTC
works fine on ppc64
Comment 3 Joshua Kinard gentoo-dev 2005-04-11 21:21:03 UTC
We really don't have a testcase for subversion on mips.  It's not even marked as unstable yet.  Thus, the best we can offer is a ~mips keyword or pass us over and leave it unmarked until a time arises when it's used by someone on our arch.
Comment 4 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-12 03:07:58 UTC
kumba, this is fine with me ;)
Comment 5 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 06:30:10 UTC
Tested fine on ppc with 1.1.4.
Comment 6 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 11:04:50 UTC
Trapni. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE involve me on subversion. It's my package. Don't go behind my back. Just tell me when apache is going to be marked stable.
Comment 7 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 11:08:12 UTC
Also, the version to test should be 1.1.3-r1, not 1.1.4 which is still not out of it's normal testing period.
Comment 8 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 11:14:47 UTC
seriousely, I'm pretty sure that I've added you to the CC. I might be wrong (because it's been a long non-sleeping period). But I'm pretty sure I did. We also talked about in #gentoo-apache about. However, if not, sorry for missing this.

second, when talking about 1.1.3-r1, than it should contain the [no]webdav useflag, as this is, what the demand is for.
Comment 9 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 11:21:27 UTC
Trapni, I've never seen bugs suggesting demand for optional neon support. I'll keep the nowebdav (webdav surprises users as it takes away default and expected functionality). I've been cc'ed, sorry I missed it. I guess I'll have to filter out those pesky dev-portage bugs. It are too many.
Comment 10 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 11:25:15 UTC
nowebdav is okay and the new gentoo subversion server will *need* this as it'll install a server-only subversion and though, will not need to install neon. that's all the effords I've had recently.
Comment 11 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 12:26:54 UTC
If you want server only, I'll look into whether that would be an option. I don't think so though as for maintenance one would need to have some of the binaries. Most libraries are shared between that code. Also for things like cvs2svn one needs the python bindings which need a full set of libraries.
Comment 12 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 12:42:31 UTC
Alright, so what do you want the arch maintainers to test exactly then?  It's easier if it's specific!

Comment 13 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-14 13:24:31 UTC
Well just test the 1.1.4 ebuild. The -r1 version no longer exists, it's changes are incorporated in 1.1.4. If apache is not marked stable before the middle of next week that should be ok.
Comment 14 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-07 17:36:14 UTC
Well.  Nothing happened to either this nor the request in bug 88667.

As a sidenote: This version without neon- and webdav-support should be installed on our cvs-server, so that we can offer also subversion repositories.  If you don't test the version from comment #13, subversion for Gentoo activities will be delayed.

Trapni, please keep an eye on this bug and tell me, when we have a stable subversion with our needed features in portage, so that I can install it on lark.
Comment 15 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-07 18:43:19 UTC
pylon, yeah, but still... I'm on hold position; I'm not the only one making descisions, I've to wait what the others (in apache herd) are thinking about apr, apr-util, apache (etc) going stable, and it looks like we've to drop  some yet amazing supports off the current feature list to get stable sooner (I mean LFS); Since in the ebuild itself, I'm using a server-only installation on one of the svn servers I maintain and it didn't break anything yet (and isn't supposed to be - so I think)

and still, I'm having an eye on this bug here ;)

pauldv? as you're the assignier of this bug - any objections? 
Comment 16 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-08 06:11:58 UTC
From my end 1.1.4 could be marked stable. The waiting is on apache.
Comment 17 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-08 12:13:34 UTC
For a ssh+svn setup do the apr/apr-utils really need to be a harddep?

USE="-apache2" ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -pv subversion

[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/apr-0.9.6-r2  -debug -ipv6 0 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.6-r1  +berkdb -gdbm -ldap 0 kB 
[ebuild  N    ] dev-util/subversion-1.1.4  -apache2 -bash-completion +berkdb -debug -emacs -java -nls +nowebdav -perl -python +ssl 0 kB 
Comment 18 Christian Parpart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-08 16:11:23 UTC
AFAIK, only LFS(large file support) is must be dropped off - as a showstopper so far. there may be more, but I do not know/remember :(

apr and apr-util are both required as the whole subversion is used to it.

any thoughts about the other apache herd's guys???
Comment 19 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-09 00:31:40 UTC
Trapni's right. Subversion is built on the apr / apr-util libraries. These can be compared in a way to glib if you want to get an idea on their functioning.
Comment 20 Aaron Walker (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-29 18:09:52 UTC
Marked ~mips.
Comment 21 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-08-15 21:47:11 UTC
looks ok on arm/s390
Comment 22 Tom Gall (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-09 19:59:44 UTC
removing ppc64 as we've already got 1.2.3 of subversion marked stable and this
bug was about marking 1.1.4 stable!   My how times flies!
Comment 23 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-28 21:22:33 UTC
This has been marked stable on ppc, thanks hansmi.
Comment 24 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-29 05:11:42 UTC
alpha done.

Comment 25 Aron Griffis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-02 11:30:29 UTC
1.2.3 stable on ia64
Comment 26 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-25 18:26:15 UTC
Sparc done
Comment 27 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-04 06:58:05 UTC
hppa seems to be ok.
Comment 28 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-05 02:21:10 UTC
Oldie! Closing bug