Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 874357 - media-sound/deadbeef-1.9.3 installs .desktop files that do not pass validation
Summary: media-sound/deadbeef-1.9.3 installs .desktop files that do not pass validation
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Piotr Karbowski (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 885521 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: .desktop
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2022-10-03 07:39 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2022-12-12 11:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build.log (build.log,382.62 KB, text/plain)
2022-10-03 07:39 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-10-03 07:39:23 UTC 
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: media-sound/deadbeef-1.9.2 installs .desktop files that do not pass validation.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-10-03 07:39:26 UTC 
Created attachment 816145 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-10-27 06:18:14 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 1.9.2-r1 - Updating summary.
Comment 3 Piotr Karbowski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2022-11-14 21:21:32 UTC 
Reported upstream. I will let it stay open until upstream respond, but I do not consider it to be a blocker for stabilization.
Comment 4 Piotr Karbowski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2022-11-14 21:36:27 UTC 
Upstream response

> This can't really be fixed, as far as I know.
> We define some actions used in Ubuntu, and they are valid and functional, but they fail validation of some tools which think that those actions are invalid.
> 
> Although if you can provide a working solution for this problem - I'd gladly accept it.

What is the general view on it? How of a QA severity it would be? From what I see, it just make the automated tool noisy, but otherwise the .desktop file works. Because of it and upstream stance, I'd lean toward closing it with WONTFIX, unless there's better idea?
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-11-15 15:11:06 UTC 
ci has reproduced this issue with version 1.9.3 - Updating summary.
Comment 6 Piotr Karbowski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2022-11-17 21:00:34 UTC 
(In reply to Piotr Karbowski from comment #4)
> Upstream response
> 
> > This can't really be fixed, as far as I know.
> > We define some actions used in Ubuntu, and they are valid and functional, but they fail validation of some tools which think that those actions are invalid.
> > 
> > Although if you can provide a working solution for this problem - I'd gladly accept it.
> 
> What is the general view on it? How of a QA severity it would be? From what
> I see, it just make the automated tool noisy, but otherwise the .desktop
> file works. Because of it and upstream stance, I'd lean toward closing it
> with WONTFIX, unless there's better idea?

I will then resolve it with WONTFIX. If in future a feasible solution arrive, I will be more than happy to follow it, otherwise we have perfectly working desktop file that expands over the spec to fit Ubuntu's and this upsets the automated tool.

Feel free to reopen it if anything like new ideas arrives.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-12-12 11:13:13 UTC 
*** Bug 885521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***