trueprint, by far the best code-printing application of all time, does not have an ebuild. http://www.gnu.org/software/trueprint/trueprint.html Here is the ebuild that I used: trueprint-5.3.ebuild: inherit eutils DESCRIPTION="Code pretty-printer" HOMEPAGE="http://www.gnu.org/software/trueprint/" SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz" LICENSE="GPL" SLOT="0" KEYWORDS="x86" S=${WORKDIR}/trueprint-${PV} src_unpack() { unpack ${A} cd ${S} epatch ${FILESDIR}/Makefile.in.diff } src_compile() { econf || die emake || die } src_install() { einstall || die } The patch to the .in file fixes some compilation problems -- I think that the person who created the package was not experienced with autotools. Of course, neither am I, but I think this fixes the problems that I was seeing: files/Makefile.in.diff --- Makefile.in.old 2005-02-28 23:29:36.217653592 -0500 +++ Makefile.in 2005-02-28 23:29:58.093327984 -0500 @@ -99,44 +99,6 @@ config.status: $(srcdir)/configure $(CON $(srcdir)/configure: $(srcdir)/configure.in $(ACLOCAL_M4) $(CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES) cd $(srcdir) && $(AUTOCONF) -config.h: stamp-h1 - @if test ! -f $@; then \ - rm -f stamp-h1; \ - $(MAKE) stamp-h1; \ - else :; fi -stamp-h1: $(srcdir)/config.h.in $(top_builddir)/config.status - cd $(top_builddir) \ - && CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h \ - $(SHELL) ./config.status - @echo timestamp > stamp-h1 2> /dev/null -$(srcdir)/config.h.in: $(srcdir)/stamp-h1.in - @if test ! -f $@; then \ - rm -f $(srcdir)/stamp-h1.in; \ - $(MAKE) $(srcdir)/stamp-h1.in; \ - else :; fi -$(srcdir)/stamp-h1.in: $(top_srcdir)/configure.in $(ACLOCAL_M4) acconfig.h - cd $(top_srcdir) && $(AUTOHEADER) - @echo timestamp > $(srcdir)/stamp-h1.in 2> /dev/null - -config.h: stamp-h2 - @if test ! -f $@; then \ - rm -f stamp-h2; \ - $(MAKE) stamp-h2; \ - else :; fi -stamp-h2: $(srcdir)/config.h.in $(top_builddir)/config.status - cd $(top_builddir) \ - && CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h \ - $(SHELL) ./config.status - @echo timestamp > stamp-h2 2> /dev/null -$(srcdir)/config.h.in: $(srcdir)/stamp-h2.in - @if test ! -f $@; then \ - rm -f $(srcdir)/stamp-h2.in; \ - $(MAKE) $(srcdir)/stamp-h2.in; \ - else :; fi -$(srcdir)/stamp-h2.in: $(top_srcdir)/configure.in $(ACLOCAL_M4) acconfig.h - cd $(top_srcdir) && $(AUTOHEADER) - @echo timestamp > $(srcdir)/stamp-h2.in 2> /dev/null - mostlyclean-hdr: clean-hdr: Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Please watch bug #61311. Thanks *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61311 ***
Errr... this is NOT a duplicate of bug #61311, this is about Trueprint, not Turboprint. And while I'm here, don't post ebuilds in the comments box, include them as attachments please.
Reopening the bug. Sorry my eyes are very heavy.
please attach your trueprint ebuild but a maintainer is misssing: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/maintainer.txt
Created attachment 77227 [details] Trueprint 5.3 ebuild Attached is the 5.3 ebuild. The hack I did before to try to get it to compile seems to no longer be needed, either due to a new version of portage, or something else. I recommend that this go into app-text.
(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this bug) 'EBUILD' is in the KEYWORDS which should mean that there is a ebuild attached to this bug. This bug is assigned to maintainer-wanted which means that it is not in the main tree. Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely manner. There are simply too many new packages. Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =) Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. Thanks, On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team, Jeremy. [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/ [2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq
Last release was 2001, and the package is even considered abandoned on its homepage.
