Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 847829 - dev-lang/gforth keywords: arm64, arm keywording
Summary: dev-lang/gforth keywords: arm64, arm keywording
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Keywording (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2022-05-27 22:29 UTC by Jeff Gazso
Modified: 2022-06-23 19:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
dev-lang/gforth ~arm ~arm64 dev-libs/ffcall ~arm ~arm64
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeff Gazso 2022-05-27 22:29:45 UTC
dev-lang/gforth installs and runs without any obvious issues on amd64 and arm64 and so it should be marked as stable on those arches in my view.

Please mark dev-lang/gforth as unstable on arm (32-bit), ppc64, and riscv. GNU Forth is very portable by design and should work just fine, but I have not tested it on those arches.
Comment 1 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-05-28 02:55:13 UTC
We generally only keyword on some arches if something actually needs it on them to save resources. Is it likely a dependency will need them, or a person?
Comment 2 Jeff Gazso 2022-05-28 03:51:33 UTC
Hey Sam,

I think I might be laboring under a misunderstanding. Whenever I use something that isn't stable on my arches — mostly amd64 and arm64 — I submit a request to stabilize the keyword for those arches if I think it's ready.

When I do that, I review the list of other arches and see if there are any grayed out arches. If there are, I ask whatever revision I'm seeking to stabilize be marked unstable on those arches. From my perspective it just seems like good house keeping. It sounds like this isn't quite the proper mindset.

(I'll follow up with you on IRC when I'm more awake and try to get a better grasp of the matter. Please forgive the unintentional resource consumption on my part, I really was trying to do the right thing.)

I amend my request:

I've tested gforth by building and using it on arm64, amd64 and believe it to be stable on those arches. I think it's worth adding ~arm because 32-bit arm SBC's are common enough and it seems weird to stabilize arm64 and ignore arm (32) altogether. Never mind the other arches.

Is that better?
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-06-19 02:00:14 UTC
Sure! (We discussed it more on IRC, just saying here for the record).

If you want it stable on some arches, please file a new bug (e.g. amd64).
Comment 4 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev 2022-06-19 02:04:32 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 5 Arthur Zamarin archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2022-06-23 19:50:28 UTC
arm done

all arches done