https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ Issue: dev-java/jansi-2.4.0 does not respect LDFLAGS. Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci) NOTE: To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.
CC'ing also the author of the commit (efd93be2c628aaeb5573aec651a9388ac7276387)
Created attachment 762393 [details] build.log build log and emerge --info
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e753542599ad045f9b7a004156480b12584b5ce4 commit e753542599ad045f9b7a004156480b12584b5ce4 Author: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net> AuthorDate: 2022-01-17 15:11:20 +0000 Commit: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-01-18 09:56:21 +0000 dev-java/jansi: LDFLAGS Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831350 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/23842 Signed-off-by: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> dev-java/jansi/jansi-2.4.0-r1.ebuild | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
