Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 83098 - Konversation works for amd64
Summary: Konversation works for amd64
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: AMD64 Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-23 11:47 UTC by Esben Mose Hansen
Modified: 2005-02-24 00:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Esben Mose Hansen 2005-02-23 11:47:35 UTC
I have seen no issues with this application on amd64 (currently masked)

This was with version 0.15.1


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Malcolm Lashley (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-23 13:32:19 UTC
Not masked in cvs - been ~amd64 since 19th Jan?

malc@commodore64 ~/gentoo-x86/net-irc/konversation $ cvs annotate -r1.1 konversation-0.15.1.ebuild | grep KEY

Annotations for konversation-0.15.1.ebuild
***************
1.1          (swegener 19-Jan-05): KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~amd64 ~sparc"
Comment 2 Esben Mose Hansen 2005-02-23 14:30:08 UTC
Portage calls the ~amd64 for "masked by keyword". So I assumed masked was the correct word, sorry about that. 

What I meant was "Konversation works, so the ~amd64 might be unneccessary". 

I thought I read in the guide to masked packages that users should report when a ~amd64 package worked, but I cannot find that piece of documentation any longer, and the handbook does not mention. (The handbook says wait a couple of weeks :-/ ) So sorry about that, too.
Comment 3 Malcolm Lashley (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-23 17:07:05 UTC
Esben, please accept my apologies - I think we were both hit by language barrier induced confusion! I will mark the ebuild 'stable'.
Comment 4 Malcolm Lashley (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-23 17:28:06 UTC
Fixed, in CVS, thanks, sorry for any confusion.
Comment 5 Esben Mose Hansen 2005-02-24 00:51:44 UTC
No problem, and thanks :-)