https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ Issue: dev-ada/libadalang-22.0.0 does not respect LDFLAGS. Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci) NOTE: To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.
Created attachment 760153 [details] build.log build log and emerge --info
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8ba0d090dedc66de57363af399b287494aa9253d commit 8ba0d090dedc66de57363af399b287494aa9253d Author: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-12-24 22:12:36 +0000 Commit: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-12-24 22:12:36 +0000 dev-ada/libadalang: use LDFLAGS Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/829869 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org> dev-ada/libadalang/libadalang-22.0.0.ebuild | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
