Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 80266 - Xemacs does not like AltGr any more: "iso-level3-shift not defined"
Summary: Xemacs does not like AltGr any more: "iso-level3-shift not defined"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 66508
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo X packagers
URL: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.ph...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Inclusion
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-31 15:51 UTC by Michel Arboi
Modified: 2005-06-28 18:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michel Arboi 2005-01-31 15:51:10 UTC
See thread on the forum. I have the same problem with x11-xorg: AltGr kills incremental searches or macro definitions. However, in normal entry mode, it works fine (but it prints "iso-level3-shift not defined" on the status bar)
Recompiling Xemacs does not fix the problem. Upgrading x11-xorg to the latest available (~x86) version does not cwork either.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open Xemacs
2.Start an incremental search with ^S
3.Type a character that needs AltGr (e.g. a square bracket on the French keyboard)



Actual Results:  
The search is aborted with "iso-level3-shift not defined"
AltGr also abort macro definitions.


See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=137868
It seems that Xorg needs a simple patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/attachment.cgi?id=109626
Comment 1 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-01-31 23:05:13 UTC
Emacs guys, there's a patch for your end too if you're interested. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2004-10/msg00150.html -- linked from the RH bug.
Comment 2 Martin Pohlack 2005-03-09 01:51:25 UTC
This is a duplicate of bug #72614.
Comment 3 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-28 18:16:34 UTC
Looks like it's resolved in the original, bug #66508.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 66508 ***