Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 802111 - dev-util/uncrustify-0.72.0 fails to compile with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks]
Summary: dev-util/uncrustify-0.72.0 fails to compile with dev-lang/python-exec[-native...
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Fabian Groffen
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 762406
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-07-14 06:19 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2023-02-03 21:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,35.40 KB, text/plain)
2021-07-14 06:19 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details
1-CMakeOutput.log (1-CMakeOutput.log,44.71 KB, text/plain)
2021-07-14 06:19 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-07-14 06:19:35 UTC
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: dev-util/uncrustify-0.72.0 fails to compile with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks].
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)

NOTE:
This machine uses GCC-11: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
Please take a look at the tracker bug for more info.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-07-14 06:19:37 UTC
Created attachment 723775 [details]
build.log

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-07-14 06:19:38 UTC
Created attachment 723778 [details]
1-CMakeOutput.log

1-CMakeOutput.log
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-07-14 06:19:40 UTC
Possible context of error(s):

  Could NOT find PythonInterp (missing: PYTHON_EXECUTABLE)
Comment 4 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2023-02-03 21:11:46 UTC
So what about 0.75.1/0.76.0?
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-02-03 21:23:50 UTC
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #4)
> So what about 0.75.1/0.76.0?

if CI didn't bump the version I guess it is fixed, let's see..