In order for Gentoo Linux to properly support side-by-side installation of different versions of Lua (including LuaJIT), please migrate this package as to lua.eclass (for packages which should support multiple Lua implementations at the same time, i.e. most likely Lua modules) or lua-single.eclass (for packages which only have to support one Lua implementation at a time). For details, consult documentation of respective eclasses as well as already-migrated ebuilds in the tree. Please note that since slotted dev-lang/lua is currently masked, your migrated ebuilds should be masked as well. There is a section of package.mask, created in September 2020, which you can use for this purpose so that it will be easier in the future to unmask them all in one go. Thank you in advance for your effort!
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=83a9b99be74a50b93743b9cdd709d40832a67243 commit 83a9b99be74a50b93743b9cdd709d40832a67243 Author: Erik Mackdanz <stasibear@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-14 20:55:53 +0000 Commit: Erik Mackdanz <stasibear@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-14 20:55:53 +0000 games-roguelike/stone-soup: Implement lua-single eclass Signed-off-by: Erik Mackdanz <stasibear@gentoo.org> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/752696 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 .../stone-soup/stone-soup-0.25.1-r100.ebuild | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=addbb017b8495d986a24b1d036414c060f45749d commit addbb017b8495d986a24b1d036414c060f45749d Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-14 23:36:14 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-14 23:37:22 +0000 profiles/package.mask: mask lua-slotted games-roguelike/stone-soup We have to mask new lua-single ebuilds for now until the slotted Lua ebuilds themselves are unmasked, otherwise tree consistency is broken. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/752696 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Thanks. I ignored the QA notification because I knew I committed the mask, but 'repoman commit' apparently removed it from the commit.
(In reply to Erik Mackdanz from comment #3) > Thanks. I ignored the QA notification because I knew I committed the mask, > but 'repoman commit' apparently removed it from the commit. No problem. Yeah, repoman won't handle anything in profiles/. I think it unstages anything not in the current working directory, but not sure. I know I've had fun with interactions between it and git add -p before... (Note: If you pushed all at once including a profile change, the CI failure should be a warning sign because it wouldn't have split up the changes).
