Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 735374 - media-gfx/mypaint-2.0.1: need py3 port
Summary: media-gfx/mypaint-2.0.1: need py3 port
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL: https://github.com/mypaint/mypaint/is...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 701100 708500 737794
Blocks: scons-python3 py3-tracker, python-3-incompatible
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2020-08-02 14:28 UTC by Michał Górny
Modified: 2020-09-25 14:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
media-gfx/mypaint-2.0.1 * media-gfx/mypaint-brushes-2.0.2 * media-libs/libmypaint-1.6.1 *
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-08-02 14:28:25 UTC 
Please port to py3.
Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2020-08-16 19:48:55 UTC 
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2b51ea3a2a46efbfafb80a2d8a62f5d678d5f57d

commit 2b51ea3a2a46efbfafb80a2d8a62f5d678d5f57d
Author:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2020-08-16 19:48:42 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2020-08-16 19:48:42 +0000

    media-gfx/mypaint: bump to 2.0.1
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/735374
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/708500
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/701098
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/701104
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/701078
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/662562
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.2, Repoman-2.3.23
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 media-gfx/mypaint/Manifest             |  1 +
 media-gfx/mypaint/mypaint-2.0.1.ebuild | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
Comment 2 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-08-17 02:20:12 UTC 
Preparing bug for stabilisation after some time in ~arch.
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-09-06 21:05:32 UTC 
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Preparing bug for stabilisation after some time in ~arch.

We have only just worked around bug 739122. Let's give it a few more days to see if further issues arise...
Comment 4 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-09-16 14:02:45 UTC 
Can we do it now?  It's blocking numpy-py2.
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-09-16 17:56:42 UTC 
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #4)
> Can we do it now?  It's blocking numpy-py2.

Oh, go on then. I'll just include it in the other bug.
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-09-18 13:20:26 UTC 
@maintainer(s):
I see open bugs about test failure. Atm I'm reproducing the issue on x86. Can you clarify if you want to care about tests or we should stabilize while the tests are failing? Thanks.
Comment 7 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2020-09-18 13:56:13 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3c19116e7f0be5bfeda197d9a1ae37c7ffe81391

commit 3c19116e7f0be5bfeda197d9a1ae37c7ffe81391
Author:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 13:55:55 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2020-09-18 13:55:55 +0000

    media-gfx/mypaint: add gdk-pixbuf[jpeg] dep
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/735374
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 media-gfx/mypaint/{mypaint-2.0.1-r1.ebuild => mypaint-2.0.1-r2.ebuild} | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Comment 8 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2020-09-18 13:58:22 UTC 
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #6)
> @maintainer(s):
> I see open bugs about test failure. Atm I'm reproducing the issue on x86.
> Can you clarify if you want to care about tests or we should stabilize while
> the tests are failing? Thanks.

Sorry, missed that. Give it a whirl now.