Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 721192 - dev-perl/Bio-DB-HTS questionable licensing
Summary: dev-perl/Bio-DB-HTS questionable licensing
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.ht...
Whiteboard: Upstream fixed, bump / fix LICENSE in...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: perl-license
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2020-05-06 09:23 UTC by Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED)
Modified: 2021-11-19 22:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2020-05-06 09:23:04 UTC
https://metacpan.org/source/AVULLO/Bio-DB-HTS-3.01/DISCLAIMER

says:

- Perl5
- Indemnity clauses for simply having a copy
- Attribution requirements for researchers.

The rest of the distribution says Apache-2.0, so I've filed an upstream bug to rectify this.
Comment 1 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2020-05-06 12:11:55 UTC
Having worked in the EMBL-EBI team responsible for Bio::DB::HTS in the not-so-distant past, I am pretty sure you are right and this file is a holdover from ye olden days. Unfortunately it might take them a while to react, not in the least because the guy who owns this package on CPAN left EBI last year and his successor transferred to another team earlier this year... I've just pinged the relevant project leader to hopefully prevent this issue from slipping through the cracks.
Comment 2 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2020-07-18 11:21:54 UTC
As predicted, even though the project leader responded to me pretty much immediately nothing has changed in the code so far. I have just created a pull request removing the problematic file, hopefully that will speed things along.
Comment 3 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2020-09-01 13:41:11 UTC
The offending file has been removed upstream.
Comment 4 Marek Szuba archtester gentoo-dev 2020-10-09 12:21:25 UTC
Between upstream having already confirmed Apache-2.0 is the only licence that applies, them having removed the offending file from the master branch, and us not installing said file, not much else to do here until upstream has actually released a new version.
Comment 5 Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2020-10-10 09:00:02 UTC
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #4)
> Between upstream having already confirmed Apache-2.0 is the only licence
> that applies, them having removed the offending file from the master branch,
> and us not installing said file, not much else to do here until upstream has
> actually released a new version.

On behalf of perl@, I'd just like this kept open until we've bumped it and/or otherwise made sure the various LICENSE definitions in the ebuild are up-to-date.

Sci@ don't have to care any more beyond that.
Comment 6 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2021-11-19 22:26:20 UTC
> On behalf of perl@, I'd just like this kept open until we've bumped it
> and/or otherwise made sure the various LICENSE definitions in the ebuild are
> up-to-date.

Nope. Fixed.