I'm about to add a mask on ssl in package.stable.mask to that stabilization in bug 684972 can resume. To sum things up: mupdf 1.14+ needs openssl 1.1 but until r3, it didn;t properly depend on it and mupdf, not finding libcrypto-1.1 with pkg-config, silently built without it. So we have 1.14.0-r2 that is already stabilized and depend on openssl:0, but with a broken openssl support. I will not select 1.14.0-r2 in my mask to avoid needless rebuilds, but technically, the mask would apply. This bug is used to track the status of openssl 1.1 stabilization and see when the mask can be removed.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=225a0b359efeb283ecb221f49a071f2db378cfcc commit 225a0b359efeb283ecb221f49a071f2db378cfcc Author: Virgil Dupras <vdupras@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-05-10 19:22:10 +0000 Commit: Virgil Dupras <vdupras@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-05-10 19:22:10 +0000 app-text/mupdf: stable-mask ssl USE flag Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/685584 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/684972 Signed-off-by: Virgil Dupras <vdupras@gentoo.org> profiles/base/package.use.stable.mask | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
(In reply to Virgil Dupras from comment #0) > [...] > This bug is used to track the status of openssl 1.1 stabilization and see > when the mask can be removed. dev-libs/openssl-1.1.1d-r2 is stable, so this mask could be removed, please.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ebad55685f991d2d8c995d4f117c6f51fbbf2349 commit ebad55685f991d2d8c995d4f117c6f51fbbf2349 Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-10-27 16:53:58 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-10-27 16:55:30 +0000 profiles: base: Drop obsolete app-text/mupdf[ssl] p.use.stable.mask Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/685584 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> profiles/base/package.use.stable.mask | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
