https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2001af3/output.html#sys-apps/dtc Introduced on Saturday by jer@'s non-maintainer version bump: commit ba909937189940a6be301f664001407825cd614e Author: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: Sat Dec 1 14:27:15 2018 Commit: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> CommitDate: Sat Dec 1 14:27:50 2018 sys-apps/dtc: Version 1.4.7 Add USE="test valgrind" as the test suite fails without it. This is already fixed upstream where Makefile checks before use so the live ebuild did not require this change. Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.52, Repoman-2.3.12 Signed-off-by: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=86e06dba5999dc4c090106b6a34a6709d4fab1c8 commit 86e06dba5999dc4c090106b6a34a6709d4fab1c8 Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2018-12-11 14:19:25 +0000 Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2018-12-11 14:20:27 +0000 sys-apps/dtc: Revert "Version 1.4.7" Revert non-maintainer bump introducing CI issues. Please take responsibility for what you commit, and fix the breakage you introduce. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/672506 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> sys-apps/dtc/Manifest | 1 - sys-apps/dtc/dtc-1.4.7.ebuild | 61 ------------------------------------------- sys-apps/dtc/metadata.xml | 3 --- 3 files changed, 65 deletions(-)
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #0) > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2001af3/output.html#sys-apps/ > dtc > > Introduced on Saturday by jer@'s non-maintainer version bump: I have been a member of the PPC/PPC64 team for many years.
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #0) > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2001af3/output.html#sys-apps/ > dtc Is `repoman full` broken?
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > > Introduced on Saturday by jer@'s non-maintainer version bump: > > I have been a member of the PPC/PPC64 team for many years. That's now what [1] says. (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #3) > (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #0) > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2001af3/output.html#sys-apps/ > > dtc > > Is `repoman full` broken? I don't see the relevance of this question. [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:PowerPC
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #4) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > > > Introduced on Saturday by jer@'s non-maintainer version bump: > > > > I have been a member of the PPC/PPC64 team for many years. > > That's now what [1] says. I just found that out, too. I joined the team in December 2009, my e-mails say. Perhaps my membership was never properly recorded or was lost in translation after the move to wiki.g.o. I really don't care enough to find out as team membership policy was developed after that time. Since I lost faith in stabilisation, I have been mostly updating PPC packages.
So instead of masking the atom or fixing the ebuild, you chose to remove the ebuild. How odd. And then close this bug report as if any real work was done.
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3d79c54aba7eba3ca94367d9f864b066d7e04012 should disable valgrind dependency. We can re-introduce use-flag and run valgrind-aware tests if needed. Tests seem to run fine.