Created attachment 502776 [details] qt5-build.class Previous versions of QT all followed the same naming convention for the SRC_URI. However, upstream has changed this convention for 5.10. For example, qtbase for 5.9_beta3 is named: qtbase-opensource-src-5.9-beta4.tar.xz However qtbase for 5.10_beta3 is named: qtbase-everywhere-src-5.10.tar.xz For reference see the following links: http://download.qt.io/development_releases/qt/5.9/5.9.0-beta3/submodules/ http://download.qt.io/development_releases/qt/5.10/5.10.0-beta3/submodules/ Note that the directory structure is the same, it is just the filenames that have changed. This can be fixed with a simple change to the eclass starting at line 80: from: MY_P=${QT5_MODULE}-opensource-src-${PV/_/-} to: if [[ ${QT5_MINOR_VERSION} -ge 10 ]]; then MY_P=${QT5_MODULE}-everywhere-src-${PV/_*/} else MY_P=${QT5_MODULE}-opensource-src-${PV/_/-} fi It is likely the final 5.10 release will have the same issue. In which case, simply make the same change a few lines further down in the file. I have tested this with qtcore and qtnetowrk (which both download qtbase) version 5.10.0_beta3. Found while testing libressl compatibility in bug 562050. Fixed eclass attached (based on the latest from the qt overlay on github).
Is the second MY_P conditionally necessary? I'm not sure what it'd match as that path should only match non-alpha/beta/rc releases.
The second conditional would effect the final 5.10.0 release when it drops. At this point we don't know for sure what format it will use, but I fully expect it will be the same as the development versions. In that case, the second conditional will be necessary.
(In reply to maurerpe from comment #0) > Created attachment 502776 [details] > qt5-build.class > > Fixed eclass attached (based on the latest from the qt overlay on github). Please attach a diff next time.
Thanks, this has been fixed in git by Chiitoo. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/qt.git/commit/?id=12a98e5265ea65c6e604eb1a0d8cf7d78cfc8589
