HTML-Mason depends on libapreq. libapreq-1.3 pulls in Apache-1*. We need libapreq2.
Renat: I assume this is RT as in www-apps/rt, the RT from bestpractical.com... I've got it running on Apache 2 in a Fedora environment... I think the ebuild needs to be fixed up since it's got some bad depends... I also don't understand how it's "unstable" in Apache 2... It's working better in 3 Apache 2 environ's then an Apache 1 environ where it's constantly having issues. I'll work on this with ya.
That'd be great. - bad depends? - it's unstable on apache2/mod_perl2 per upstream (but should be fine with fcgi). once we get libapreq2 in portage, i'll happily add an apache2 USE flag. for now, no matter what, libapreq1 and Apache1 get pulled in
libapreq2 is in Portage but it is hard masked.
libapreq2 just worked fine for me... even with FEATURES=maketest. Along with mod_perl 1.99.17 (new version I commited as per rac's approval). Maybe we can think about not having this in hard mask? Renat: As far as bad depends go... yes... RT is missing depends on this package. And it's hardcoded to call "apachectl" which is an Apache 1 only program.
Victory... Looks like I've gotten rt to work from just an emerge -u rt on Apache 2. :) Patches to come soon.
Hows it goin Doug? Would be nice to throw that apache-1 installation out the door... ;-)
Doug, any chance you can post your patches?
See: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81257 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81253 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81116
Folks, rt-3.4.2 is in portage. Apache2 support is still broken, so for now, Apache 1 only. Let's revisit this once the dust settles on the recent Apache migration.
How exactly is Apache 2 support still broken? I've been using Apache 2 + RT in Gentoo using ebuilds since the 3.2.x pre-release versions of RT. That's over a year ago. I've been trying to get in touch with you about fixes. I've even been told by the web-apps herd to just take over rt in Portage myself cause you were MIA. So.. What's the deal? Why won't you add Apache 2 support?
(In reply to comment #10) > How exactly is Apache 2 support still broken? I've been using Apache 2 + RT in > Gentoo using ebuilds since the 3.2.x pre-release versions of RT. That's over a > year ago. I've been trying to get in touch with you about fixes. I've even been > told by the web-apps herd to just take over rt in Portage myself cause you were MIA. > > So.. What's the deal? Why won't you add Apache 2 support? 1. Ongoing Apache refresh 2. Working mod_perl2 masked 3. libapreq2 and HTML-Mason seem to be in flux 4. Lack of time. I understand beu is working on 1-3, and I'll take care of 4.
cat: /usr/portage/www-apps/rt/files/config.layout-gentoo: No such file or directory is the error msg I get with your rt-3.4.2 ebuild. I'm guessing you forgot to commit a file. I just checked viewcvs and didn't see it there.
Committed.
(In reply to comment #10) > How exactly is Apache 2 support still broken? I've been using Apache 2 + RT in > Gentoo using ebuilds since the 3.2.x pre-release versions of RT. That's over a > year ago. I've been trying to get in touch with you about fixes. I've even been > told by the web-apps herd to just take over rt in Portage myself cause you were MIA. > > So.. What's the deal? Why won't you add Apache 2 support? rt-3.4.2-r1 now supports apache2 + fastcgi, as well as lighttpd. mod_perl2 support is next.
hi guys. libapreq2-2.06 is now in portage. can you please test if this solves the problems you are having with this. thanks.
Now that libapreq2 is unmasked, rt-3.4.2-r1 supports apache2.
