Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 607450 - dev-ruby/rdoc-5.0.0-r3 file collision with dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10
Summary: dev-ruby/rdoc-5.0.0-r3 file collision with dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Ruby Team
Depends on:
Reported: 2017-01-28 09:03 UTC by Martin Mokrejš
Modified: 2017-10-03 09:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

build.log (build.log,23.80 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-23 12:26 UTC, Martin Mokrejš
build.log (build.log,23.80 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-23 12:27 UTC, Martin Mokrejš
build.log (build.log,4.47 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-23 12:29 UTC, Martin Mokrejš

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Mokrejš 2017-01-28 09:03:37 UTC
*      /apps/gentoo/usr/bin/rdoc21
 *      /apps/gentoo/usr/bin/ri21
Comment 1 Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev 2017-02-22 05:57:08 UTC
Could you please provide all the output?
Comment 2 Martin Mokrejš 2017-02-23 12:26:34 UTC
Created attachment 464854 [details]
Comment 3 Martin Mokrejš 2017-02-23 12:27:28 UTC
Created attachment 464856 [details]
Comment 4 Martin Mokrejš 2017-02-23 12:29:03 UTC
Created attachment 464858 [details]

My bad!
Comment 5 Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev 2017-07-23 07:19:26 UTC
Looking at the output this on prefix? I'm wondering about the different paths in the portage output, where one mentions a prefix of /apps/gentoo and the other does not.

In any case /usr/bin/rdoc21 should be installed only by dev-ruby/rdoc. I'm not aware of any bugs related to this for ruby 2.1.10. Perhaps the best course of action would be to re-emerge ruby 2.1.10 and see if this fixes the situation.
Comment 6 Martin Mokrejš 2017-10-03 09:20:48 UTC
I will try to test after overcoming bug #633358.