Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 572848 - Restore the old tar based way of unpacking the portage tree and explain how to verify it's keys
Summary: Restore the old tar based way of unpacking the portage tree and explain how t...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs on www.gentoo.org
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installation Handbook (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Docs Team
URL: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-01-25 10:31 UTC by charles17
Modified: 2016-01-30 01:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description charles17 2016-01-25 10:31:25 UTC
With reference to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507774#c9 please
restore the old tar based way of unpacking the portage tree and explain how to verify it's keys.

emerge-webrsync as given in https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:Parts/Installation/Base#Installing_a_Portage_snapshot cannot get anything verified at this point.
Comment 1 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev 2016-01-29 00:53:26 UTC
There's nothing preventing anyone from running gpg to verify a portage snapshot, so I don't understand what's the complaint here.
Also, it's possible to download a distfile through https - https://distfiles.gentoo.org/snapshots/
Comment 2 charles17 2016-01-29 07:31:07 UTC
(In reply to Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto from comment #1)
> There's nothing preventing anyone from running gpg to verify a portage
> snapshot, so I don't understand what's the complaint here.
> Also, it's possible to download a distfile through https -
> https://distfiles.gentoo.org/snapshots/

The complaint is about handbook having switched to recommending emerge-webrsync instead.
Comment 3 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-01-30 01:32:01 UTC
please don't file bugs for pages in the wiki. use the appropriate "discussion" tab on that wiki page if you have suggestions.

there's a reason why we switched from the old manual unpack process to the automated webrsync process. referencing an old invalid bug isn't a reason to switch back.