570446 – [Tracker] Packages failing to build because of gcc-5 changed inline semantics

Bug 570446 - [Tracker] Packages failing to build because of gcc-5 changed inline semantics

Summary: [Tracker] Packages failing to build because of gcc-5 changed inline semantics

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 536984

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Linux bug wranglers

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Tracker

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2016-01-01 02:58 UTC by Sven E.
Modified:	2017-01-19 18:46 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Sven E. 2016-01-01 02:58:04 UTC

I'm seeing wuite a stack of BUGs that all relate to the changed inline semantics of c99 which is covered in 'Porting to gcc-5'. I think it would be wise to collect all those different bugs in this tracker.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Alex Xu (Hello71) 2016-01-01 20:25:35 UTC

*which* bugs?

Comment 2 Sven E. 2016-01-01 20:31:15 UTC

(In reply to Alex Xu (Hello71) from comment #1)
> *which* bugs?

I.E.:  #570352 

Yes the original Sourcecode seems pretty much dead. I'm sure I've seen more 'undefined reference' bugs which relate to inlien semantics.

Comment 3 David Kredba 2016-01-01 21:26:29 UTC

There is a gcc-5 tracker.

In my opinion maintaining another one for inlining issues only is not helping anyhow.

Comment 4 Sven E. 2016-01-01 21:31:19 UTC

(In reply to David Kredba from comment #3)
> There is a gcc-5 tracker.
> 
> In my opinion maintaining another one for inlining issues only is not
> helping anyhow.

Ah!

I guess I missed out on that one, as I anticipated it was already closed BEFORE gcc-5 was unmasked.

Anyhow, yes, then all the inline semantics related failures should probably go into the gcc-5 Tracker directly.

Comment 5 Alex Xu (Hello71) 2016-01-02 16:33:55 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 536984 ***