Removed an uninvited package.use.mask entry.
Do I need to police the fucking profiles now?
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #1) > Do I need to police the fucking profiles now? If there's some issue with profile changes, please describe it in a civilised manner. I don't appreciate getting bugmail like this.
(In reply to Michael Palimaka (kensington) from comment #2) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #1) > > Do I need to police the fucking profiles now? > > If there's some issue with profile changes, please describe it in a > civilised manner. I don't appreciate getting bugmail like this. I meant to say "freaking". Sorry.
Marked ~hppa. Closing.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #1) > Do I need to police the fucking profiles now? I am very sorry. The use flag doesn"t exist before and the it wasnt masked globaly so where is the exact problem for hppa users?
(In reply to Johannes Huber from comment #5) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #1) > > Do I need to police the fucking profiles now? > > I am very sorry. The use flag doesn"t exist before and the it wasnt masked > globaly so where is the exact problem for hppa users? Read the manual, drop the keyword, file a keyword request. Except for comment #1, this bug should be exemplary for your future reference.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #6) > > Read the manual, drop the keyword, file a keyword request. Except for > comment #1, this bug should be exemplary for your future reference. I can not find a common agreement on this, so maybe you want a policy established for all arches.