538022 – net-misc/bridge-utils should RDEPEND on selinux ? sec-policy/selinux-brctl

Bug 538022 - net-misc/bridge-utils should RDEPEND on selinux ? sec-policy/selinux-brctl

Summary: net-misc/bridge-utils should RDEPEND on selinux ? sec-policy/selinux-brctl

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	SELinux (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Robin Johnson

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates (1):	493408 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:	527868
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2015-01-28 04:06 UTC by R030t1
Modified:	2015-05-16 06:31 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description R030t1 2015-01-28 04:06:02 UTC

Merging the package in the title does not pull in the (presumably) related package sec-policy/selinux-brctl.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Merge net-misc/bridge-utils.

Comment 1 Jason Zaman gentoo-dev

2015-01-29 06:44:50 UTC

Next time there is a bump of mrtg, please add a dep for the selinux policy. The policy should only be added to RDEPEND, not to DEPEND

Thanks

Comment 2 Jason Zaman gentoo-dev

2015-01-29 06:45:41 UTC

copy paste fail, sorry.

s/mrtg/bridge-utils/g

Comment 3 Robin Johnson archtester

2015-05-16 06:30:55 UTC

InCVS.

There will never be a bump of bridge-utils, upstream recommends that the bridge functionality of iproute2 is used instead.

Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester

2015-05-16 06:31:11 UTC

*** Bug 493408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***