>>> Downloading 'http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/distfiles/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz' --2014-09-23 15:49:23-- http://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/distfiles/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz Resolving mirror.datapipe.net... 64.27.65.115 Connecting to mirror.datapipe.net|64.27.65.115|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2014-09-23 15:49:23 ERROR 404: Not Found. >>> Downloading 'ftp://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/distfiles/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz' --2014-09-23 15:49:23-- ftp://mirror.datapipe.net/gentoo/distfiles/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz => ‘/usr/portage/distfiles/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz’ Resolving mirror.datapipe.net... 64.27.65.115 Connecting to mirror.datapipe.net|64.27.65.115|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /gentoo/distfiles ... done. ==> SIZE stunnel-5.03.tar.gz ... done. ==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR stunnel-5.03.tar.gz ... No such file ‘stunnel-5.03.tar.gz’. >>> Downloading 'http://www.stunnel.org/downloads/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz' --2014-09-23 15:49:24-- http://www.stunnel.org/downloads/stunnel-5.03.tar.gz Resolving www.stunnel.org... 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe96:80c4, 207.192.69.165 Connecting to www.stunnel.org|2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe96:80c4|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2014-09-23 15:49:24 ERROR 404: Not Found. !!! Couldn't download 'stunnel-5.03.tar.gz'. Aborting. * Fetch failed for 'net-misc/stunnel-5.03', Log file: * '/tmp/portage/net-misc/stunnel-5.03/temp/build.log'
I guess your mirrors are lagging, I can fetch it fine.
From chatter on IRC, I think there was a 'burp' on Gentoo mirrors that is slowly being resolved. In any case, it would not hurt to add the mirrors listed on the stunnel downloads page to SRC_URI. http://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html
http://infra-status.gentoo.org/notice/20140920-distfiles for that one
(In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #2) > From chatter on IRC, I think there was a 'burp' on Gentoo mirrors that is > slowly being resolved. > > In any case, it would not hurt to add the mirrors listed on the stunnel > downloads page to SRC_URI. > > http://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html I added 7 mirrors to stunnel-5.04.ebuild. I'll wait a few days to amke sure nothing breaks and I'll back port them to the stable versions.
has anyone realised that^W^W^W^W the actual issue here is that old binaries are moved to /archives/
(In reply to Alex Xu (Hello71) from comment #5) > has anyone realised that^W^W^W^W the actual issue here is that old binaries > are moved to /archives/ Yes, we've addressed that in 5.04. I'll backport the fix there if it works in a couple of days. Reopen this if I forget.
*** Bug 523642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
23 Sep 2014; Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> stunnel-5.04.ebuild: Update SRC_URI to use the archives for older versions Only you didn't. The older versions in the tree got nu updated SRC_URI.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #8) > 23 Sep 2014; Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> stunnel-5.04.ebuild: > Update SRC_URI to use the archives for older versions > > Only you didn't. The older versions in the tree got nu updated SRC_URI. you misread. it was meant along the lines of "use the archives if the version has been bumped". i.e. "older versions" means upstream, not gentoo-x86.
or, actually, "use the archives so that fetching older versions works"
(In reply to Alex Xu (Hello71) from comment #9) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #8) > > 23 Sep 2014; Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> stunnel-5.04.ebuild: > > Update SRC_URI to use the archives for older versions > > > > Only you didn't. The older versions in the tree got nu updated SRC_URI. > > you misread. it was meant along the lines of "use the archives if the > version has been bumped". i.e. "older versions" means upstream, not > gentoo-x86. Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion. Basically the SRC_URI points to upstream's archives which has not only the latest version but also previous versions so that we should *always* be pointing to some valid upstream tarball. What caused this error was a hickup in our mirrors. If this happens again, we should be always be pointing at a valid upstream tarball. I hope this ^^ is clear. Anyhow, if people are okay with this, I'll back port SRC_URI to 5.03. I'll wait a few more days.
Reopening to prevent further duplicates.
*** Bug 523734 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #12) > Reopening to prevent further duplicates. Okay its backported to 5.03 and 5.02.