Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 521988 - dev-python/scimath-4.1.2-r1 keyword/stable request
Summary: dev-python/scimath-4.1.2-r1 keyword/stable request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Python Gentoo Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-09-02 16:14 UTC by Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos)
Modified: 2014-09-08 03:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,789.67 KB, text/plain)
2014-09-05 03:45 UTC, Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-02 16:14:19 UTC
Looks like it's missing dep on scimath.
Comment 1 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-05 03:45:02 UTC
Created attachment 384216 [details]
build.log

Sorry, this was supposed to be attached already, not sure exactly what happened.
Comment 2 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-05 03:55:31 UTC
numpy's keywords are:

alpha amd64 arm ~arm64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 ~s390 ~sh sparc x86 ~amd64-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-freebsd ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~arm-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~sparc-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris

but scimath's keywords are:

~amd64 ~x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux

That leaves a pretty big delta to take care of before we can add this dep:

alpha amd64 arm ~arm64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 ~s390 ~sh sparc x86 ~amd64-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-freebsd ~x86-interix ~arm-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~sparc-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris
Comment 3 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-05 03:59:45 UTC
Arches, I'm sorry...numpy is missing this dep so we need to get this fixed.

STABLEREQ, target keywords:

alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 x86 


KEYWORDREQ, target keywords:

~arm64  ~mips ~s390 ~sh sparc ~amd64-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-freebsd ~x86-interix ~arm-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~sparc-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris
Comment 4 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-05 04:02:19 UTC
Sorry, target version looks like dev-python/scimath-4.1.2-r1
Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-09-06 13:00:55 UTC
Which packages are supposed to depend on dev-python/scimath?
Comment 6 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-07 03:21:24 UTC
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5)
> Which packages are supposed to depend on dev-python/scimath?

dev-python/numpy-*
Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-09-07 21:36:11 UTC
(In reply to Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5)
> > Which packages are supposed to depend on dev-python/scimath?
> 
> dev-python/numpy-*

But they don't. Please fix that first.
Comment 8 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-08 03:17:47 UTC
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #7)
> (In reply to Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5)
> > > Which packages are supposed to depend on dev-python/scimath?
> > 
> > dev-python/numpy-*
> 
> But they don't. Please fix that first.

I don't believe that dropping all the keywords, including stable ones, from numpy would be appreciated.  Or perhaps I'm to mask a stable and widely used package?

Or I'll just add the dep and all the users will get visibility issues?

No, how about we just add the keywords that I requested please.  Thanks.
Comment 9 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-08 03:39:17 UTC
I've been informed by Arfrever that I read the code wrong and this is numpy's internal scimath that is failing, not the package scimath.  Apologies for the noise to the arch teams. The problem seems to be in numpy...just not sure what yet.
Comment 10 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-09-08 03:51:09 UTC
Okay, despite replicating this bug on multiple systems it seems there was a deep linking issue with blas-reference.  It looks like somehow blas-reference was installed but not eselected (despite no other blas provider ever being pulled in) and this caused several issues.  If I can reliably reproduce what causes this I'll open a new bug for whatever the issue with blas or eselect-blas is.