Per: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=b72ddf0f4f552dd53d6404b6ddbc9f17d02b8e12 Introduced in systemd-216, looks like we will need to update ntp providers unit files. I doubt about dropping current ntp-units.d files as that would require us to need systemd-216. We should probably provide both ways for a transition period. What do you think? Not sure if there is any way to check for this apart of manually :/, in my case I have net-misc/ntp and it needs updating, but I am nearly sure it's the same for other ntp implementations in the tree
We should add: Conflicts=systemd-timesyncd.service to the units then
Right. I've already taken care of chrony.
As for other providers, I think we really only have three: net-misc/chrony net-misc/openntpd net-misc/ntp
(In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #3) > As for other providers, I think we really only have three: > > net-misc/chrony > net-misc/openntpd > net-misc/ntp All handled, do you have any opinion about how will we phase out the old way and systemd_enable_ntpunit systemd.eclass function? :/