Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 519 - gcombust-0.1.48.ebuild (new package)
Summary: gcombust-0.1.48.ebuild (new package)
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: chouser (RETIRED)
Depends on:
Reported: 2002-02-04 02:02 UTC by Matthew Kennedy
Modified: 2003-02-04 19:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

gcombust-0.1.48.ebuild (gcombust-0.1.48.ebuild,511 bytes, text/plain)
2002-02-04 02:03 UTC, Matthew Kennedy

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matthew Kennedy 2002-02-04 02:02:00 UTC
Howdy, I have attached a gcombust-0.1.48.ebuild.

gcombust has no mandatory dependencies other than gtk at run and build time. It
does however support a number of other tools at runtime if they happen to be
available. The author of gcombust "requires/recommends" gtk+1.2.10 as a
dependency. gcombust is an interface like gtoaster and probably fits best in
Comment 1 Matthew Kennedy 2002-02-04 02:03:17 UTC
Created attachment 121 [details]
Comment 2 chouser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-02-04 21:59:30 UTC
Just a couple comments... Any particular reason you didn't include the README in
the dodoc line?  Also, you left out the Gentoo Copyright line; I included it, so
if that's a problem, let me know right away.  Also, I appreciate the comments in
the bug description.

Thanks for the great ebuild -- we appreciate it.  Keep up the good work.

Comment 3 Matthew Kennedy 2002-02-04 22:40:38 UTC
No, the gentoo tech. inc. copyright is not a problem for me. Sorry about the
README and the copyright omission. I'm gradually building up a general test
sequence for myself to help catch these kinds of mistakes.

Comment 4 chouser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-02-05 08:47:46 UTC
Don't worry about the omissions -- no big deal, I just wanted to make sure I
wasn't missing some good reason to leave them out.

Thanks again,