Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 51248 - Logical Volumes not enabled on Raid Devices
Summary: Logical Volumes not enabled on Raid Devices
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 37418
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-16 22:25 UTC by micah compton
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
example checkfs file. (checkfs,4.25 KB, text/plain)
2004-05-16 22:29 UTC, micah compton
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description micah compton 2004-05-16 22:25:28 UTC
baselayout-1.9.2

PROBLEM:
Recently I have been using LVM2 volumes on raid devices and have discovered a recent change in /etc/init.d/checkfs system script is causing my logical volumes to be marked inactive.

On further investigation the reason for this behaviour was due to the logical volume activation section being above the raid section.

FIX: Move LVM section below RAID section in /etc/init.d/checkfs
Comment 1 micah compton 2004-05-16 22:29:34 UTC
Created attachment 31560 [details]
example checkfs file.

my current /etc/init.d/checkfs script with modifications.
Comment 2 Steve 2004-12-20 11:13:32 UTC
This is a pretty trivial fix.  Why has this fix not been included in gentoo?
Comment 3 jhmartin 2004-12-20 15:26:45 UTC
It works for me with the unmodified checkfs, however I have the raid code compiled in to the kernel directly and am using the auto-raid-detection option.
Comment 4 micah compton 2004-12-21 10:50:18 UTC
it appears that the issue has been resolved in version baselayout-1.11.8 although the original (baselayout-1.9.4-r6.ebuild) has not been amended.
Comment 5 Sven Wegener gentoo-dev 2004-12-21 10:58:29 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37418 ***