Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 486020 - Please stabilize =dev-tex/xmltex-1.9-r3
Summary: Please stabilize =dev-tex/xmltex-1.9-r3
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: TeX project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 485608
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-09-25 19:28 UTC by Christoph Junghans (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-09-25 20:44 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 19:28:59 UTC
Needed for bug #485608.

Target keywords: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86

@tex: Please add archs whenever you feel, this is ready.
Comment 1 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 19:41:02 UTC
hu ? no, just do the changes in place, no need for a stabilisation round for this
Comment 2 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 19:43:13 UTC
(In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #1)
> hu ? no, just do the changes in place, no need for a stabilisation round for
> this
I was wrong, it is stable on x86.
Comment 3 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 19:47:50 UTC
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #2)
> (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #1)
> > hu ? no, just do the changes in place, no need for a stabilisation round for
> > this
> I was wrong, it is stable on x86.

you're answering to the wrong bug I think :)


what I mean is: your changes do not justify a rev bump
Comment 4 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 20:12:39 UTC
(In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #1)
> > > hu ? no, just do the changes in place, no need for a stabilisation round for
> > > this
> > I was wrong, it is stable on x86.
> you're answering to the wrong bug I think :)
> what I mean is: your changes do not justify a rev bump
Doesn't a EAPI bump forces a revision bump?
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2183/focus=2187>

Anyhow, we are going from 0 to 5, that doesn't make me feel good without extensive testing!
Comment 5 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 20:29:33 UTC
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #4)
> Doesn't a EAPI bump forces a revision bump?
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2183/focus=2187>

your link says it all: installed file aren't changed, deps aren't changed, no subslot has been added, etc. package is basically the same -> no rev bump

> Anyhow, we are going from 0 to 5, that doesn't make me feel good without
> extensive testing!

it is not _that_ of a jump if you know what you're doing :=)
Comment 6 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-25 20:44:36 UTC
(In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #5)
> it is not _that_ of a jump if you know what you're doing :=)
You convinced me!

+  25 Sep 2013; Christoph Junghans <ottxor@gentoo.org> -xmltex-1.9-r3.ebuild,
+  xmltex-1.9-r2.ebuild:
+  EAPI bump without version bump (bug #486020)