Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 484038 - www-apache/mod_perl-2.0.8: version bump (WAS: www-apache/mod_perl-2.0.7 and dev-lang/perl-5.18.1: ‘PL_rehash_seed’ undeclared)
Summary: www-apache/mod_perl-2.0.8: version bump (WAS: www-apache/mod_perl-2.0.7 and d...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Server (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Christian Ruppert (idl0r)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 484266 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-09-06 19:18 UTC by Martin von Gagern
Modified: 2014-06-02 07:13 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build log (www-apache:mod_perl-2.0.7:20130906-182203.log,93.15 KB, text/plain)
2013-09-06 19:18 UTC, Martin von Gagern
Details
mod_perl-2.0.8-bundled-Apache-Test.patch (mod_perl-2.0.8-bundled-Apache-Test.patch,3.61 KB, patch)
2013-09-07 14:41 UTC, Martin von Gagern
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin von Gagern 2013-09-06 19:18:51 UTC
Created attachment 358102 [details]
build log

After upgrading perl to 5.18.1, mod_perl won't remerge:

modperl_perl.c: In function ‘modperl_hash_seed_set’:
modperl_perl.c:272:9: error: ‘PL_rehash_seed’ undeclared (first use in this function)
modperl_perl.c:273:9: error: ‘PL_rehash_seed_set’ undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [modperl_perl.lo] Error 1
Comment 1 Martin von Gagern 2013-09-06 21:13:21 UTC
According to [1], updating to mod_perl 2.0.8 should solve this issue. There are release notes for it [2], and a new homepage [3]. The commit in question should be [4]. Its commit message mentions [5] which has some discussion on this.

[1] http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2013/06/03/msg018134.html
[2] http://blogs.perl.org/users/phred/2013/04/mod-perl-208-has-been-released.html
[3] http://projects.apache.org/projects/mod_perl.html
[4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1457618
[5] https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=83921
Comment 2 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-09-07 14:27:59 UTC
(In reply to Martin von Gagern from comment #1)
> According to [1], updating to mod_perl 2.0.8 should solve this issue. There
> are release notes for it [2], and a new homepage [3]. The commit in question
> should be [4]. Its commit message mentions [5] which has some discussion on
> this.
> 
> [1] http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2013/06/03/msg018134.html
> [2]
> http://blogs.perl.org/users/phred/2013/04/mod-perl-208-has-been-released.html
> [3] http://projects.apache.org/projects/mod_perl.html
> [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1457618
> [5] https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=83921

thanks for the report! Will bump it!
Comment 3 Martin von Gagern 2013-09-07 14:41:34 UTC
Created attachment 358182 [details, diff]
mod_perl-2.0.8-bundled-Apache-Test.patch

This is my stab at porting the existing mod_perl-2.0.7-bundled-Apache-Test.patch to 2.0.8. It applies and compiles, but the test itself fails. Might be due to reasons mentioned in that lengthy comment within the ebuild, but since I've got FEATURES=userpriv, it should not apply. In theory. If tests succeed for you, I can provide a log for my tests as well.
Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-10 13:22:15 UTC
*** Bug 484266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 A. Person 2013-12-22 14:57:59 UTC
It would be great to have 2.0.8 in portage if possible.
Comment 6 Christian Ruppert (idl0r) gentoo-dev 2013-12-22 20:03:56 UTC
2.0.8 has just been added. Thanks guys!
Comment 7 Sergiy Borodych 2014-06-02 06:57:55 UTC
what about a stabilization? :)
Comment 8 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2014-06-02 07:02:29 UTC
(In reply to Sergiy Borodych from comment #7)
> what about a stabilization? :)

File a separate bug, please.
Comment 9 Sergiy Borodych 2014-06-02 07:13:52 UTC
(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> (In reply to Sergiy Borodych from comment #7)
> > what about a stabilization? :)
> 
> File a separate bug, please.

You are right.
Done #512114.