Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 46895 - Gtk+-2.4.0: Feature Patch
Summary: Gtk+-2.4.0: Feature Patch
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-04-05 14:11 UTC by Matt T. Proud
Modified: 2004-04-28 07:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

gtk+-2.4.0-gtkentry.patch (gtk+-2.4.0-gtkentry.patch,1.08 KB, patch)
2004-04-05 14:12 UTC, Matt T. Proud
Details | Diff
gtk+-2.4.0-gtktextentry.patch (gtk+-2.4.0-gtktextview.patch,1.84 KB, patch)
2004-04-05 14:13 UTC, Matt T. Proud
Details | Diff
gtk+-2.4.0.ebuild (gtk+-2.4.0.ebuild,2.34 KB, application/octet-stream)
2004-04-05 14:13 UTC, Matt T. Proud

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matt T. Proud 2004-04-05 14:11:49 UTC
Despite submitting this patch to the Gtk+ developers, I thought that it could receive a greater reception with the Gentoo crew, so that is why I am submitting it here too.

This patch enables a new feature on Gtk's right-click context that allows one to "Clear" the contents of a textbox. It is disabled by default, but one can enable it by setting GTK_SUPERFLUOUS_ADDITIONS=1 and starting the respective application. 

Before arbitarily deeming this as unsafe, consider trying the patch.

 * Before:
 * After:
Comment 1 Matt T. Proud 2004-04-05 14:12:44 UTC
Created attachment 28754 [details, diff]
Comment 2 Matt T. Proud 2004-04-05 14:13:10 UTC
Created attachment 28755 [details, diff]
Comment 3 Matt T. Proud 2004-04-05 14:13:37 UTC
Created attachment 28756 [details]
Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-06 09:35:35 UTC
what is the upstream patch bug ?

in general we do not add patches that will not make it into the main tree...
Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-04-28 07:04:44 UTC
we need the requested info in comment #4 before we will consider adding this.