Please convert overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/projects/java-config-2 to git and make the repo available on git.overlays.gentoo.org as proj/java-config.git. Note: the version suffix "-2" shall be dropped. As stated in bug 457818 the initial list of who will have access is. Gentoo Java Members: betelgeuse caster elvanor fordfrog sera serkan Thanks.
Ready for review: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/java-config.git;a=summary I made the history go back way before /projects/java-config-2/. Through the eyes of svneverever, this is the history that is included: first last path rev rev ================================================ ( 1; 2479) /gentoo-java-experimental ( 4; 8) /java-config-ng ( 4; 8) /branches ( 4; 8) /tags ( 4; 8) /trunk [..] ( 9; 2489) /java-config-ng ( 9; 2489) /branches ( 193; 2489) /axxo ( 306; 318) /symlink-axxo ( 9; 2489) /tags ( 9; 2489) /trunk [..] (2488; 9253) /projects (2490; 9253) /java-config-2 (2490; 9253) /branches (2490; 2587) /axxo (8765; 9253) /generation3-support (8359; 9253) /kylepan (4995; 9253) /virtuals-support (2490; 9253) /tags (2490; 2586) /trunk
Thanks for going back that far with the history. That's rather nice. I'm missing the branches and have the following additional unexpected tags. backups/axxo@2588 backups/master@2490 backups/master@2587 backups/master@9 backups/symlink-axxo@319
(In reply to comment #2) > I'm missing the branches Which ones? > and have the following additional unexpected tags. > > backups/axxo@2588 > backups/master@2490 > backups/master@2587 > backups/master@9 > backups/symlink-axxo@319 These were auto-generated by svn2git. I had a closer look and this is how come: Branch "symlink-axxo" got deleted --> Tag for last commit on branch "symlink-axxo" == backups/symlink-axxo@319 Folder /gentoo-java-experimental/java-config-ng/trunk/ was removed (or better: moved to /java-config-ng/trunk/) --> Tag for last commit on branch "master" (trunk in SVN) == backups/master@9 Branch "axxo" moved to "trunk" --> Tag for last commit on original master before == backups/master@2587 --> Tag for last commit on branch "axxo" == backups/axxo@2588 Move /java-config-2/ to /projects/java-config-2/ --> Tag with last commit of master branch with /java-config-2/ == backups/master@2490 Looking at the graph of commits... Deletion would not cut access to commits: - backups/master@9 - backups/axxo@2588 Deletion would cut access to commits: - backups/master@2490 - backups/master@2587 - backups/symlink-axxo@319 It would be possible to post-process the graph manually, but I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble. What do you think?
PS: The svneverever output excerpt had wrong numbers on path /projects/java-config-2/trunk/ due to a bug in svneverever 1.2.1 that I just fixed. Correct numbers are .. (2488; 9253) /projects (2490; 9253) /java-config-2 [..] (2490; 9253) /trunk ^^^^ .. since that folder re-appeared later.
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I'm missing the branches > > Which ones? False alarm, they are there, don't now how I managed to miss them the first time. Sorry. > > and have the following additional unexpected tags. > > > > backups/axxo@2588 > > backups/master@2490 > > backups/master@2587 > > backups/master@9 > > backups/symlink-axxo@319 > > These were auto-generated by svn2git. I had a closer look and this is how > come: > > > Branch "symlink-axxo" got deleted > --> Tag for last commit on branch "symlink-axxo" == backups/symlink-axxo@319 > > Folder /gentoo-java-experimental/java-config-ng/trunk/ was removed (or > better: moved to /java-config-ng/trunk/) > --> Tag for last commit on branch "master" (trunk in SVN) == backups/master@9 > > Branch "axxo" moved to "trunk" > --> Tag for last commit on original master before == backups/master@2587 > --> Tag for last commit on branch "axxo" == backups/axxo@2588 > > Move /java-config-2/ to /projects/java-config-2/ > --> Tag with last commit of master branch with /java-config-2/ == > backups/master@2490 > > > Looking at the graph of commits... > > > Deletion would not cut access to commits: > - backups/master@9 > - backups/axxo@2588 > > Deletion would cut access to commits: > - backups/master@2490 > - backups/master@2587 > - backups/symlink-axxo@319 > Thanks for the analysis. > > It would be possible to post-process the graph manually, but I'm not sure if > it's worth the trouble. What do you think? I find it odd to have those tags. On the other hand you can tell me that's normal and I'd buy it. Never worked with a converted repo before.
(In reply to comment #5) > > It would be possible to post-process the graph manually, but I'm not sure if > > it's worth the trouble. What do you think? > > I find it odd to have those tags. On the other hand you can tell me that's > normal and I'd buy it. Never worked with a converted repo before. I have now deleted (without losing commits): - backups/master@9 - backups/master@2587 (same commit still pointed to by backups/master@2490) - backups/axxo@2588 For backups/symlink-axxo@319 we could turn that into a branch "symlink-axxo", instead (despite its past deletion). What do you think? On backups/master@2490 deletion makes us lose two commits that did changes to /java-config-ng/trunk/ that got wiped after. Personally, I would keep it.
Looking at http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/java-config.git;a=shortlog it seems like Mike and Ralph have started using the Git repository. Conversion looks like done to me then :) Closing.
