According to README, this package is dual licensed under GPL-2+ and the following license: plan is Copyrighted by Thomas Driemeyer, 1993-2005. License to copy, publish, and distribute is granted to everyone provided that three conditions are met: - my name and email address, "Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>" must remain in the distribution and any documentation that was not part of this distribution. In particular, my name and address must be shown in the About popup. - if you redistribute a modified version, the fact that the version is modified must be stated in all places that my name is shown. - this copyright notice must be included in your distribution. If these conditions are met, you can do whatever you like. The idea is that I would be pissed if someone else claimed he wrote the thing, and I don't want bugs introduced by others attributed to me. Make as much money with it as you can. Drop me a line, I am curious. There are no implied or expressed warranties for plan. I do not claim it is good for anything whatsoever, and if you lose your precious data or your dog dies this is entirely your problem. It is somewhat unclear, e.g., what is meant by "any documentation that was not part of this distribution"? Therefore I suggest that we just ignore the alternative and mark the ebuild as GPL-2+.
Feel free to commit Thanks!
Fixed.