Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bugzilla DB migration completed. Please report issues to Infra team via email via infra@gentoo.org or IRC
Bug 432980 - dev-lisp/sbcl-1.0.55-r1 - src_compile(): The value 18446744073 is not of type (UNSIGNED-BYTE 31).
Summary: dev-lisp/sbcl-1.0.55-r1 - src_compile(): The value 18446744073 is not of type...
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-27 14:56 UTC by RCV
Modified: 2016-05-28 08:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
emerge --info (emerge.txt,17.00 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-27 14:57 UTC, RCV
Details
build log (build.log,65.32 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-27 15:01 UTC, RCV
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description RCV 2012-08-27 14:56:04 UTC
When trying to compile sbcl 1.0.55-r1 fails for unknown reason.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge sbcl

Actual Results:  
Failing with "The value 18446744073 is not of type (UNSIGNED-BYTE 31)."


Expected Results:  
Compiling and installing.
Comment 1 RCV 2012-08-27 14:57:09 UTC
Created attachment 322370 [details]
emerge --info
Comment 2 RCV 2012-08-27 15:01:27 UTC
Created attachment 322372 [details]
build log
Comment 3 RCV 2012-08-27 15:46:52 UTC
after I change PS1 back to default sbcl compile fine.
Comment 4 RCV 2012-08-27 15:46:52 UTC
after I change PS1 back to default sbcl compile fine.
Comment 5 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2012-08-28 09:13:15 UTC
Just for the record, what was your PS1 when the build failure occured?

It might be a bug in the build system we could fix, otherwise, we will close this bug as invalid.
Comment 6 Marijn Schouten (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-29 07:43:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Just for the record, what was your PS1 when the build failure occured?

From his emerge --info output PS1 appears to have been:

PS1="\[\e]2;/usr/portage/dev-lisp/sbcl\a\n\]\e(0l\e(B\]\[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[1;37m\]18:43:05, \[\033[1;30m\]0.53, \[\033[0;31m\]root\[\033[0;32m\]@\[\033[0;31m\]theorist \[\033[0;36m\]]\[\033[0;31m\] \[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[0;37m\]/usr/portage/dev-lisp/sbcl\[\033[0;36m\] ]\[\033[0;37m\]\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\n\[\e(0\]m\[\e(B\]\[\033[0;32m\]\[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[0;32m\]# \[\033[0;39m\]"

Presumably that value is the result of variable substitution.

RCV, what value(s) have you set for PS1?
Comment 7 RCV 2012-08-29 09:14:51 UTC
> RCV, what value(s) have you set for PS1?

PS1="\u@\h:"
Comment 8 Andrey Grozin gentoo-dev 2013-03-18 03:37:22 UTC
If you want sbcl, maybe, it would be better to unmask and emerge sbcl-1.1.5.
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-05-28 08:41:23 UTC
please retry with current versions in the tree