Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 432980 - dev-lisp/sbcl-1.0.55-r1 - src_compile(): The value 18446744073 is not of type (UNSIGNED-BYTE 31).
Summary: dev-lisp/sbcl-1.0.55-r1 - src_compile(): The value 18446744073 is not of type...
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-27 14:56 UTC by RCV
Modified: 2016-05-28 08:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
emerge --info (emerge.txt,17.00 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-27 14:57 UTC, RCV 		Details
build log (build.log,65.32 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-27 15:01 UTC, RCV 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description RCV 2012-08-27 14:56:04 UTC 
When trying to compile sbcl 1.0.55-r1 fails for unknown reason.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge sbcl

Actual Results:  
Failing with "The value 18446744073 is not of type (UNSIGNED-BYTE 31)."


Expected Results:  
Compiling and installing.
Comment 1 RCV 2012-08-27 14:57:09 UTC 
Created attachment 322370 [details]
emerge --info
Comment 2 RCV 2012-08-27 15:01:27 UTC 
Created attachment 322372 [details]
build log
Comment 3 RCV 2012-08-27 15:46:52 UTC 
after I change PS1 back to default sbcl compile fine.
Comment 4 RCV 2012-08-27 15:46:52 UTC 
after I change PS1 back to default sbcl compile fine.
Comment 5 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2012-08-28 09:13:15 UTC 
Just for the record, what was your PS1 when the build failure occured?

It might be a bug in the build system we could fix, otherwise, we will close this bug as invalid.
Comment 6 Marijn Schouten (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-29 07:43:43 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Just for the record, what was your PS1 when the build failure occured?

From his emerge --info output PS1 appears to have been:

PS1="\[\e]2;/usr/portage/dev-lisp/sbcl\a\n\]\e(0l\e(B\]\[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[1;37m\]18:43:05, \[\033[1;30m\]0.53, \[\033[0;31m\]root\[\033[0;32m\]@\[\033[0;31m\]theorist \[\033[0;36m\]]\[\033[0;31m\] \[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[0;37m\]/usr/portage/dev-lisp/sbcl\[\033[0;36m\] ]\[\033[0;37m\]\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\e(0q\e(B\n\[\e(0\]m\[\e(B\]\[\033[0;32m\]\[\033[0;36m\][ \[\033[0;32m\]# \[\033[0;39m\]"

Presumably that value is the result of variable substitution.

RCV, what value(s) have you set for PS1?
Comment 7 RCV 2012-08-29 09:14:51 UTC 
> RCV, what value(s) have you set for PS1?

PS1="\u@\h:"
Comment 8 Andrey Grozin gentoo-dev 2013-03-18 03:37:22 UTC 
If you want sbcl, maybe, it would be better to unmask and emerge sbcl-1.1.5.
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-05-28 08:41:23 UTC 
please retry with current versions in the tree