Bug 423071 – dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2 and dependency stable request

• Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Hans de Graaff 2012-06-23 06:22:34 UTC]

dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2 has been in the tree for over a month and has no open bug reports. It also has the ruby19 target and is used in a number of other packages that should be marked stable. This also requires a new rexical version that is marked for ruby19.

=dev-ruby/rexical-1.0.5-r1
=dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-06-23 10:00:42 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 2 Andreas Schürch 2012-06-30 15:32:10 UTC]

=dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2 fails tests here on x86, if ruby19 is the only target that is set. Ok, it only then runs the tests at all...

# Running tests:

............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................F...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................F...FFFF..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................S................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Finished tests in 4.768884s, 240.5175 tests/s, 629.0781 assertions/s.

  1) Failure:
test_subclass_parse(Nokogiri::XML::TestDocument) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_document.rb:361]:
--- expected
+++ actual
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>
 <?TEST-STYLE PIDATA?>
 <!DOCTYPE staff SYSTEM \"staff.dtd\" [
-<!NOTATION notation1 PUBLIC \"notation1File\" >
 <!NOTATION notation2 SYSTEM \"notation2File\" >
+<!NOTATION notation1 PUBLIC \"notation1File\" >
 <!ENTITY ent1 \"es\">
 <!ENTITY ent2 \"1900 Dallas Road\">
 <!ENTITY ent3 \"Texas\">


  2) Failure:
test_encode_special_chars(Nokogiri::XML::TestNodeEncoding) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_node_encoding.rb:42]:
Expected: "US-ASCII"
  Actual: "UTF-8"

  3) Failure:
test_get_attribute(Nokogiri::XML::TestNodeEncoding) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_node_encoding.rb:14]:
Expected: "US-ASCII"
  Actual: "UTF-8"

  4) Failure:
test_name(Nokogiri::XML::TestNodeEncoding) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_node_encoding.rb:52]:
Expected: "US-ASCII"
  Actual: "UTF-8"

  5) Failure:
test_content(Nokogiri::XML::TestNodeEncoding) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_node_encoding.rb:47]:
Expected: "US-ASCII"
  Actual: "UTF-8"

  6) Failure:
test_path(Nokogiri::XML::TestNodeEncoding) [/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2/work/ruby19/tenderlove-nokogiri-e69ff7a/test/xml/test_node_encoding.rb:57]:
Expected: "US-ASCII"
  Actual: "UTF-8"

1147 tests, 3000 assertions, 6 failures, 0 errors, 1 skips
rake aborted!
Command failed with status (1): [/usr/bin/ruby19 -w -I.:lib:bin:test:. -e '...]

[Comment 3 Hans de Graaff 2012-07-03 18:37:57 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> =dev-ruby/nokogiri-1.5.2 fails tests here on x86, if ruby19 is the only
> target that is set. Ok, it only then runs the tests at all...

We've restricted tests for the most part because there are several issues with the test suite in this release. The failures you quoted look innocent to me, so let's ignore them.

I've added 1.5.5 today with pretty much all tests running and passing, so we'll probably try to stable that in a month or so, but for now I think we should continue with 1.5.2.

[Comment 4 Andreas Schürch 2012-07-04 07:00:00 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> I've added 1.5.5 today with pretty much all tests running and passing, so
> we'll probably try to stable that in a month or so, but for now I think we
> should continue with 1.5.2.
OK :-)

x86 stable, thanks!

[Comment 5 nixnut (RETIRED) 2012-07-22 15:33:32 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 6 Anthony Basile 2012-07-26 12:50:39 UTC]

Stable ppc64

[Comment 7 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-10-28 12:00:31 UTC]

ia64/sparc stable

[Comment 8 Hans de Graaff 2012-10-29 07:37:44 UTC]

Obsoleted by bug 440094